Stock vs Stock Comparison

Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. vs Airbnb, Inc.

RCL wins the Tale of the Tape 5–4.

RCL$286.42
ABNB$133.59

🏆 Tale of the Tape

54
RCLABNB
23.8%Profitability (Net Margin)20.5%
17.4xValuation (P/E)32.9x
14.3%Efficiency (ROIC)23.5%
7/9Health (Piotroski F)5/9
2.2Safety (Altman Z)4.2
8.8%Growth (Rev YoY)10.3%
0.82Risk (Sharpe 1Y)0.23
3.06xBalance Sheet (D/E)1.71x
1.33%FCF Yield

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Rolling Correlation

0.492
252-Day Correlation
0.422
126-Day Correlation

Moderately correlated — some diversification benefit from holding both.

Fundamentals

MetricRCLABNB
Market Cap$76.3B$79.1B
P/E Ratio17.4x32.9x
Forward P/E14.2x22.1x
P/B7.78x10.39x
Dividend Yield1.76%
Beta1.781.21

Quantitative Metrics

MetricRCLABNB
DCF Fair Value$28.81
DCF Upside-89.8%
Piotroski F7/95/9
Altman Z2.224.17
Beneish M-2.85-2.87
FCF Yield1.33%
Net Debt/EBITDA2.4x
ROIC14.3%23.5%
WACC14.2%
ROIC – WACC0.1pp
Gross Margin49.4%83.0%
Net Margin23.8%20.5%
Rev Growth YoY8.8%10.3%
Sharpe (1Y)0.820.23
Max Drawdown 3Y-35.0%
FCF Payout Ratio67%

RCL Price

Loading chart...

ABNB Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

RCL found in:

IWP2.26%
VOT1.51%
XLY1.50%
VCR1.05%
VO0.65%
VYM0.28%
VONG0.22%
SPYG0.19%
ESGV0.14%
VTV0.13%
SPLG0.12%
ONEO0.11%
VOO0.11%
VUG0.11%
SPY0.10%
VONE0.10%
SPTM0.10%
VTI0.09%
VT0.06%
QUS0.02%
EWX0.01%

ABNB found in:

MOAT2.72%
ARKF1.68%
VFQY1.37%
XLY1.30%
VCR0.93%
VFMV0.93%
ARKW0.50%
MGK0.38%
QQQ0.32%
SCHG0.22%
RSP0.20%
IWF0.19%
VONG0.19%
VUG0.17%
ONEO0.13%
ESGV0.11%
SPYV0.10%
VOO0.10%
IVV0.10%
SPLG0.09%
SCHX0.09%
VONE0.09%
SPY0.09%
ITOT0.09%
SCHB0.09%
SPTM0.09%
VTI0.08%
SPYG0.08%
URTH0.07%
ACWI0.06%
VT0.05%
QUS0.03%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

RCL vs ABNB: Head-to-Head Analysis

Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. (RCL) and Airbnb, Inc. (ABNB) represent two companies in the Consumer Cyclical sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, RCL leads 5–4 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, RCL generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 14.3% compared to ABNB's 23.5%. This suggests ABNB is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

The 252-day rolling correlation between RCL and ABNB is 0.492, indicating moderate co-movement, with some diversification value from holding both in a portfolio context.

RCL appears in 21 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while ABNB appears in 32 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, RCL or ABNB?

Our quantitative analysis compares RCL and ABNB across nine fundamental dimensions. RCL wins the Tale of the Tape 5–4. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are RCL and ABNB correlated?

The 252-day correlation between RCL and ABNB is 0.492. They show moderate correlation — partially diversifying.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.