Stock vs Stock Comparison

Applied Materials, Inc. vs NVIDIA Corporation

NVDA wins the Tale of the Tape 7–2.

AMAT$490.05
NVDA$222.82

🏆 Tale of the Tape

27
AMATNVDA
24.7%Profitability (Net Margin)55.6%
42.4xValuation (P/E)32.4x
26.6%Efficiency (ROIC)64.1%
6/9Health (Piotroski F)4/9
16.2Safety (Altman Z)60.4
4.4%Growth (Rev YoY)65.5%
2.28Risk (Sharpe 1Y)1.48
0.78xBalance Sheet (D/E)0.31x
1.80%FCF Yield2.11%

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Rolling Correlation

0.532
252-Day Correlation
0.538
126-Day Correlation

Moderately correlated — some diversification benefit from holding both.

Fundamentals

MetricAMATNVDA
Market Cap$357.3B$5.11T
P/E Ratio42.4x32.4x
Forward P/E27.8x16.7x
P/B14.95x32.62x
Dividend Yield0.47%0.47%
Beta1.652.24

Quantitative Metrics

MetricAMATNVDA
DCF Fair Value$37.71$56.04
DCF Upside-90.5%-70.4%
Piotroski F6/94/9
Altman Z16.1860.40
Beneish M-2.57-1.14
FCF Yield1.80%2.11%
Net Debt/EBITDA-0.1x-0.0x
ROIC26.6%64.1%
WACC14.6%19.0%
ROIC – WACC12.0pp45.1pp
Gross Margin48.7%71.1%
Net Margin24.7%55.6%
Rev Growth YoY4.4%65.5%
Sharpe (1Y)2.281.48
Max Drawdown 3Y-36.9%
FCF Payout Ratio24%1%

AMAT Price

Loading chart...

NVDA Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

AMAT found in:

SOXX5.88%
SMH4.36%
XNTK3.81%
VLUE3.67%
RDVY3.32%
XLK2.25%
MOAT1.91%
MGV1.55%
VGT1.43%
QQQ1.13%
SCHV1.00%
SPYG0.97%
QUS0.91%
VFMO0.85%
VONV0.68%
DGRW0.65%
IWD0.64%
VTV0.61%
ONEO0.55%
ESGV0.55%
SPY0.53%
VOO0.51%
SPTM0.49%
VONE0.48%
SCHX0.48%
VUG0.47%
VTI0.45%
SCHB0.45%
IVV0.35%
URTH0.35%
SPLG0.32%
ITOT0.31%
VONG0.29%
VT0.28%
IWF0.28%
ACWI0.27%
RSP0.23%

NVDA found in:

SMH21.05%
VGT18.59%
IYW16.23%
SPYG15.22%
IVW14.57%
XLK14.54%
MGK13.77%
VUG13.33%
VONG13.22%
IWF12.92%
SCHG10.83%
OEF10.78%
BOTZ9.95%
QQQ9.03%
SPLG8.58%
SPY8.35%
SOXX8.26%
ESGV8.22%
VOO7.85%
JEPQ7.76%
IVV7.74%
SPTM7.72%
LRGF7.51%
VONE7.10%
IWB7.09%
SCHX6.91%
ITOT6.85%
VTI6.63%
QUAL6.50%
SCHB6.47%
DGRW5.71%
DFAC5.61%
URTH5.04%
ACWI4.84%
MTUM4.64%
VT4.15%
XNTK2.89%
QUS2.79%
DIA2.69%
ARKX2.53%
ARKQ2.41%
XSD1.87%
USMV1.64%
JEPI1.59%
ARKF1.51%
VFMV1.41%
ARKK1.29%
MOAT1.25%
ARKW1.12%
VFQY0.54%
ONEO0.22%
RSP0.20%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

AMAT vs NVDA: Head-to-Head Analysis

Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) represent two companies in the Technology sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, NVDA leads 7–2 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, AMAT generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 26.6% compared to NVDA's 64.1%. This suggests NVDA is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

The 252-day rolling correlation between AMAT and NVDA is 0.532, indicating moderate co-movement, with some diversification value from holding both in a portfolio context.

AMAT appears in 37 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while NVDA appears in 52 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, AMAT or NVDA?

Our quantitative analysis compares AMAT and NVDA across nine fundamental dimensions. NVDA wins the Tale of the Tape 7–2. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are AMAT and NVDA correlated?

The 252-day correlation between AMAT and NVDA is 0.532. They show moderate correlation — partially diversifying.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.