Stock vs Stock Comparison

Amphenol Corporation vs Microsoft Corporation

MSFT wins the Tale of the Tape 6–3.

APH$148.40
MSFT$441.31

🏆 Tale of the Tape

36
APHMSFT
18.5%Profitability (Net Margin)36.1%
42.7xValuation (P/E)26.8x
16.0%Efficiency (ROIC)20.8%
6/9Health (Piotroski F)5/9
6.6Safety (Altman Z)7.8
51.7%Growth (Rev YoY)14.9%
2.14Risk (Sharpe 1Y)-0.11
1.68xBalance Sheet (D/E)0.80x
2.48%FCF Yield2.59%

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Rolling Correlation

0.298
252-Day Correlation
0.176
126-Day Correlation

Low correlation — excellent diversification pair.

Fundamentals

MetricAPHMSFT
Market Cap$183.0B$3.34T
P/E Ratio42.7x26.8x
Forward P/E26.4x23.3x
P/B13.08x8.07x
Dividend Yield0.67%0.81%
Beta1.301.09

Quantitative Metrics

MetricAPHMSFT
DCF Fair Value$94.15$120.75
DCF Upside-35.2%-68.6%
Piotroski F6/95/9
Altman Z6.587.76
Beneish M-2.38-2.57
FCF Yield2.48%2.59%
Net Debt/EBITDA0.5x0.1x
ROIC16.0%20.8%
WACC11.9%11.5%
ROIC – WACC4.1pp9.3pp
Gross Margin36.9%68.8%
Net Margin18.5%36.1%
Rev Growth YoY51.7%14.9%
Sharpe (1Y)2.14-0.11
Max Drawdown 3Y-26.7%-33.9%
FCF Payout Ratio18%34%

APH Price

Loading chart...

MSFT Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

APH found in:

XNTK2.23%
USMV1.50%
XLK1.02%
VFMO0.87%
VGT0.85%
MGK0.82%
VIG0.82%
QUS0.70%
SCHV0.60%
VONG0.58%
IWF0.56%
VUG0.54%
SPYG0.44%
VOO0.29%
SPLG0.29%
SCHX0.29%
IVV0.28%
VONE0.27%
SCHB0.27%
VTI0.26%
ITOT0.25%
SPY0.24%
SPTM0.22%
URTH0.21%
RSP0.20%
ACWI0.18%
VT0.16%
DGRW0.16%
ONEO0.13%

MSFT found in:

VGT10.02%
IVW9.10%
SPYG8.88%
IWF8.82%
IGV8.79%
VUG8.76%
VONG8.69%
MGK8.69%
XLK8.48%
SCHG7.34%
QQQ7.17%
SPLG6.84%
OEF6.73%
IVV6.14%
DGRW6.07%
ESGV5.53%
ITOT5.43%
DIA5.13%
QUAL5.04%
JEPQ4.91%
VOO4.90%
SPY4.87%
SCHX4.69%
VONE4.60%
IWB4.59%
LRGF4.52%
SPTM4.50%
SCHB4.39%
VTI4.36%
IYW3.99%
VIG3.96%
DFAC3.92%
URTH3.24%
ACWI3.17%
DGRO2.91%
VT2.69%
QUS2.65%
MOAT2.37%
XNTK2.02%
CLOU1.97%
USMV1.56%
VFMV1.40%
XSW0.73%
SDY0.41%
RSP0.18%
ONEO0.10%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

APH vs MSFT: Head-to-Head Analysis

Amphenol Corporation (APH) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) represent two companies in the Technology sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, MSFT leads 6–3 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, APH generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 16.0% compared to MSFT's 20.8%. This suggests MSFT is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

The 252-day rolling correlation between APH and MSFT is 0.298, indicating low correlation, making them an effective diversification pair in a portfolio context.

APH appears in 29 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while MSFT appears in 46 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, APH or MSFT?

Our quantitative analysis compares APH and MSFT across nine fundamental dimensions. MSFT wins the Tale of the Tape 6–3. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are APH and MSFT correlated?

The 252-day correlation between APH and MSFT is 0.298. They have low correlation, offering good diversification.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.