Stock vs Stock Comparison

Peabody Energy Corporation vs Exxon Mobil Corporation

XOM wins the Tale of the Tape 7–2.

BTU$29.62
XOM$149.56

🏆 Tale of the Tape

27
BTUXOM
-1.4%Profitability (Net Margin)8.9%
Valuation (P/E)24.5x
0.1%Efficiency (ROIC)8.8%
3/9Health (Piotroski F)5/9
2.1Safety (Altman Z)4.6
-8.9%Growth (Rev YoY)-4.5%
1.63Risk (Sharpe 1Y)1.59
0.62xBalance Sheet (D/E)0.68x
-2.75%FCF Yield3.63%

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Rolling Correlation

0.232
252-Day Correlation
0.286
126-Day Correlation

Low correlation — excellent diversification pair.

Fundamentals

MetricBTUXOM
Market Cap$3.3B$602.1B
P/E Ratio24.5x
Forward P/E7.4x13.6x
P/B0.94x2.34x
Dividend Yield1.11%2.84%
Beta0.340.18

Quantitative Metrics

MetricBTUXOM
DCF Fair Value$41.42
DCF Upside-72.9%
Piotroski F3/95/9
Altman Z2.074.65
Beneish M-2.74-2.73
FCF Yield-2.75%3.63%
Net Debt/EBITDA-0.7x0.3x
ROIC0.1%8.8%
WACC8.3%7.8%
ROIC – WACC-8.2pp0.9pp
Gross Margin13.6%22.0%
Net Margin-1.4%8.9%
Rev Growth YoY-8.9%-4.5%
Sharpe (1Y)1.631.59
Max Drawdown 3Y-65.1%
FCF Payout Ratio73%

BTU Price

Loading chart...

XOM Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

BTU found in:

XME3.02%
SLYV0.35%
SPSM0.18%
VDE0.15%
VFMO0.14%
VTWO0.10%
VBR0.07%
VYM0.01%
SPTM0.00%

XOM found in:

XLE22.55%
IYE21.72%
VDE21.06%
HDV10.26%
DGRW3.68%
MTUM3.43%
MGV3.19%
VIG2.90%
DGRO2.90%
VYM2.72%
XOP2.62%
VTV2.51%
IWD2.36%
IVE2.26%
SPYV2.25%
SCHV2.17%
VONV1.99%
USMV1.60%
NOBL1.58%
QUS1.45%
DVY1.36%
VFMV1.28%
SDY1.08%
VOO1.04%
SCHX1.03%
SPY1.02%
VONE0.99%
SCHB0.97%
SPTM0.94%
VTI0.93%
DFAC0.88%
IVV0.87%
SPLG0.84%
ITOT0.77%
URTH0.76%
ACWI0.63%
VT0.58%
VFMO0.52%
RSP0.23%
ONEO0.07%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

BTU vs XOM: Head-to-Head Analysis

Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) represent two companies in the Energy sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, XOM leads 7–2 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, BTU generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 0.1% compared to XOM's 8.8%. This suggests XOM is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

The 252-day rolling correlation between BTU and XOM is 0.232, indicating low correlation, making them an effective diversification pair in a portfolio context.

BTU appears in 9 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while XOM appears in 40 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, BTU or XOM?

Our quantitative analysis compares BTU and XOM across nine fundamental dimensions. XOM wins the Tale of the Tape 7–2. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are BTU and XOM correlated?

The 252-day correlation between BTU and XOM is 0.232. They have low correlation, offering good diversification.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.