Stock vs Stock Comparison

The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. vs Costco Wholesale Corporation

COST wins the Tale of the Tape 7–2.

CHEF
COST$940.87

🏆 Tale of the Tape

27
CHEFCOST
1.7%Profitability (Net Margin)2.9%
54.0xValuation (P/E)47.6x
7.4%Efficiency (ROIC)21.7%
8/9Health (Piotroski F)6/9
Safety (Altman Z)9.7
9.4%Growth (Rev YoY)8.2%
Risk (Sharpe 1Y)-0.18
2.36xBalance Sheet (D/E)1.64x
FCF Yield1.92%

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Fundamentals

MetricCHEFCOST
Market Cap$4.0B$417.3B
P/E Ratio54.0x47.6x
Forward P/E36.6x41.5x
P/B6.54x25.24x
Dividend Yield0.62%
Beta1.390.87

Quantitative Metrics

MetricCHEFCOST
DCF Fair Value$61.53$629.97
DCF Upside-33.0%
Piotroski F8/96/9
Altman Z9.69
Beneish M-2.59-2.66
FCF Yield1.92%
Net Debt/EBITDA2.7x-0.6x
ROIC7.4%21.7%
WACC10.2%
ROIC – WACC11.5pp
Gross Margin24.2%12.8%
Net Margin1.7%2.9%
Rev Growth YoY9.4%8.2%
Sharpe (1Y)-0.18
Max Drawdown 3Y
FCF Payout Ratio28%

CHEF Price

Loading chart...

COST Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

CHEF found in:

SLYG0.42%
VDC0.35%
SPSM0.20%
VTWO0.11%
SPTM0.00%

COST found in:

VDC11.43%
XLP8.86%
IYC4.09%
QQQ2.50%
MGV1.96%
VIG1.81%
SCHG1.70%
VFQY1.64%
IWF1.60%
IVE1.43%
SPYV1.41%
VFMV1.40%
XRT1.26%
VUG1.15%
QUS1.06%
DGRW0.96%
ESGV0.89%
SCHX0.72%
IVV0.72%
SPLG0.69%
SCHB0.67%
VONV0.65%
SPY0.65%
VOO0.64%
ITOT0.63%
VONE0.60%
SPTM0.59%
VTI0.57%
VONG0.54%
URTH0.52%
ACWI0.45%
VT0.35%
SDY0.20%
RSP0.20%
GWX0.12%
ONEO0.04%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

CHEF vs COST: Head-to-Head Analysis

The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. (CHEF) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) represent two companies in the Consumer Defensive sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, COST leads 7–2 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, CHEF generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 7.4% compared to COST's 21.7%. This suggests COST is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

CHEF appears in 5 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while COST appears in 36 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, CHEF or COST?

Our quantitative analysis compares CHEF and COST across nine fundamental dimensions. COST wins the Tale of the Tape 7–2. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are CHEF and COST correlated?

Correlation data is not yet available for this pair. Check back after both stocks have sufficient trading history.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.