Stock vs Stock Comparison

Edwards Lifesciences Corporation vs Abbott Laboratories

EW wins the Tale of the Tape 5–3.

EW$86.00
ABT$86.99

🏆 Tale of the Tape

53
EWABT
17.7%Profitability (Net Margin)14.7%
46.7xValuation (P/E)24.0x
8.6%Efficiency (ROIC)10.1%
5/9Health (Piotroski F)5/9
10.7Safety (Altman Z)4.9
11.6%Growth (Rev YoY)5.7%
0.38Risk (Sharpe 1Y)-1.05
0.33xBalance Sheet (D/E)0.64x
3.11%FCF Yield4.21%

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Rolling Correlation

0.287
252-Day Correlation
0.338
126-Day Correlation

Low correlation — excellent diversification pair.

Fundamentals

MetricEWABT
Market Cap$49.8B$149.1B
P/E Ratio46.7x24.0x
Forward P/E25.7x14.1x
P/B4.83x2.86x
Dividend Yield2.94%
Beta0.870.65

Quantitative Metrics

MetricEWABT
DCF Fair Value$69.22$57.20
DCF Upside-11.4%-43.2%
Piotroski F5/95/9
Altman Z10.724.87
Beneish M-2.47-2.53
FCF Yield3.11%4.21%
Net Debt/EBITDA-1.6x0.1x
ROIC8.6%10.1%
WACC10.6%9.4%
ROIC – WACC-2.0pp0.7pp
Gross Margin78.0%56.4%
Net Margin17.7%14.7%
Rev Growth YoY11.6%5.7%
Sharpe (1Y)0.38-1.05
Max Drawdown 3Y
FCF Payout Ratio56%

EW Price

Loading chart...

ABT Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

EW found in:

IHI4.98%
XHE1.67%
VOT1.14%
XLV0.90%
VHT0.78%
VO0.49%
ONEO0.19%
VTV0.19%
RSP0.19%
SCHV0.17%
IWD0.15%
VONV0.15%
QUS0.11%
SPYV0.09%
ESGV0.09%
IVV0.08%
SPLG0.08%
SCHX0.08%
VOO0.08%
SPY0.08%
SCHB0.08%
ITOT0.07%
VTI0.07%
VONE0.07%
SPTM0.07%
SPYG0.06%
URTH0.06%
ACWI0.05%
VT0.04%

ABT found in:

IHI16.06%
IYH2.88%
XLV2.85%
VHT2.55%
DGRW1.71%
XHE1.36%
NOBL1.34%
SDY0.99%
MGV0.78%
VIG0.71%
VFMV0.69%
SCHV0.68%
VYM0.65%
VTV0.61%
IWD0.58%
QUS0.57%
SPYV0.53%
VONV0.48%
IVV0.37%
SPLG0.37%
ESGV0.36%
ITOT0.33%
SCHX0.33%
SCHB0.30%
VOO0.26%
VONE0.24%
SPY0.24%
URTH0.24%
VTI0.23%
SPTM0.22%
ACWI0.20%
RSP0.17%
VT0.14%
ONEO0.08%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

EW vs ABT: Head-to-Head Analysis

Edwards Lifesciences Corporation (EW) and Abbott Laboratories (ABT) represent two companies in the Healthcare sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, EW leads 5–3 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, EW generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 8.6% compared to ABT's 10.1%. This suggests ABT is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

The 252-day rolling correlation between EW and ABT is 0.287, indicating low correlation, making them an effective diversification pair in a portfolio context.

EW appears in 29 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while ABT appears in 34 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, EW or ABT?

Our quantitative analysis compares EW and ABT across nine fundamental dimensions. EW wins the Tale of the Tape 5–3. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are EW and ABT correlated?

The 252-day correlation between EW and ABT is 0.287. They have low correlation, offering good diversification.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.