Stock vs Stock Comparison

Cheniere Energy, Inc. vs Exxon Mobil Corporation

XOM wins the Tale of the Tape 5–4.

LNG$236.01
XOM$149.56

🏆 Tale of the Tape

45
LNGXOM
26.7%Profitability (Net Margin)8.9%
38.0xValuation (P/E)24.5x
16.6%Efficiency (ROIC)8.8%
7/9Health (Piotroski F)5/9
2.4Safety (Altman Z)4.6
27.2%Growth (Rev YoY)-4.5%
0.67Risk (Sharpe 1Y)1.59
2.66xBalance Sheet (D/E)0.68x
3.19%FCF Yield3.63%

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Rolling Correlation

0.315
252-Day Correlation
0.430
126-Day Correlation

Moderately correlated — some diversification benefit from holding both.

Fundamentals

MetricLNGXOM
Market Cap$47.1B$602.1B
P/E Ratio38.0x24.5x
Forward P/E11.7x13.6x
P/B12.58x2.34x
Dividend Yield0.99%2.84%
Beta0.070.18

Quantitative Metrics

MetricLNGXOM
DCF Fair Value$86.31$41.42
DCF Upside-67.0%-72.9%
Piotroski F7/95/9
Altman Z2.374.65
Beneish M-1.45-2.73
FCF Yield3.19%3.63%
Net Debt/EBITDA2.0x0.3x
ROIC16.6%8.8%
WACC6.8%7.8%
ROIC – WACC9.8pp0.9pp
Gross Margin47.7%22.0%
Net Margin26.7%8.9%
Rev Growth YoY27.2%-4.5%
Sharpe (1Y)0.671.59
Max Drawdown 3Y-24.9%
FCF Payout Ratio18%73%

LNG Price

Loading chart...

XOM Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

LNG found in:

VDE2.35%
VOE0.98%
VXF0.73%
VO0.56%
VTV0.21%
QUS0.12%
VONV0.10%
VONG0.09%
VONE0.09%
VTI0.08%
VT0.05%
ONEO0.05%

XOM found in:

XLE22.55%
IYE21.72%
VDE21.06%
HDV10.26%
DGRW3.68%
MTUM3.43%
MGV3.19%
VIG2.90%
DGRO2.90%
VYM2.72%
XOP2.62%
VTV2.51%
IWD2.36%
IVE2.26%
SPYV2.25%
SCHV2.17%
VONV1.99%
USMV1.60%
NOBL1.58%
QUS1.45%
DVY1.36%
VFMV1.28%
SDY1.08%
VOO1.04%
SCHX1.03%
SPY1.02%
VONE0.99%
SCHB0.97%
SPTM0.94%
VTI0.93%
DFAC0.88%
IVV0.87%
SPLG0.84%
ITOT0.77%
URTH0.76%
ACWI0.63%
VT0.58%
VFMO0.52%
RSP0.23%
ONEO0.07%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

LNG vs XOM: Head-to-Head Analysis

Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) represent two companies in the Energy sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, XOM leads 5–4 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, LNG generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 16.6% compared to XOM's 8.8%. This suggests LNG is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

The 252-day rolling correlation between LNG and XOM is 0.315, indicating moderate co-movement, with some diversification value from holding both in a portfolio context.

LNG appears in 12 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while XOM appears in 40 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, LNG or XOM?

Our quantitative analysis compares LNG and XOM across nine fundamental dimensions. XOM wins the Tale of the Tape 5–4. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are LNG and XOM correlated?

The 252-day correlation between LNG and XOM is 0.315. They show moderate correlation — partially diversifying.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.