Stock vs Stock Comparison

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. vs Microsoft Corporation

MSFT wins the Tale of the Tape 6–3.

CDNS$416.39
MSFT$441.31

🏆 Tale of the Tape

36
CDNSMSFT
20.9%Profitability (Net Margin)36.1%
87.8xValuation (P/E)26.8x
15.2%Efficiency (ROIC)20.8%
7/9Health (Piotroski F)5/9
11.8Safety (Altman Z)7.8
14.1%Growth (Rev YoY)14.9%
0.28Risk (Sharpe 1Y)-0.11
0.85xBalance Sheet (D/E)0.80x
2.18%FCF Yield2.59%

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Rolling Correlation

0.444
252-Day Correlation
0.494
126-Day Correlation

Moderately correlated — some diversification benefit from holding both.

Fundamentals

MetricCDNSMSFT
Market Cap$103.4B$3.34T
P/E Ratio87.8x26.8x
Forward P/E39.9x23.3x
P/B15.76x8.07x
Dividend Yield0.81%
Beta1.131.09

Quantitative Metrics

MetricCDNSMSFT
DCF Fair Value$99.50$120.75
DCF Upside-65.5%-68.6%
Piotroski F7/95/9
Altman Z11.807.76
Beneish M-2.44-2.57
FCF Yield2.18%2.59%
Net Debt/EBITDA-0.3x0.1x
ROIC15.2%20.8%
WACC11.0%11.5%
ROIC – WACC4.2pp9.3pp
Gross Margin86.4%68.8%
Net Margin20.9%36.1%
Rev Growth YoY14.1%14.9%
Sharpe (1Y)0.28-0.11
Max Drawdown 3Y-33.9%
FCF Payout Ratio34%

CDNS Price

Loading chart...

MSFT Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

CDNS found in:

SMH2.67%
VFQY0.95%
XSW0.86%
XLK0.65%
MGK0.52%
QQQ0.47%
VGT0.46%
SCHG0.31%
VONG0.29%
VUG0.28%
IWF0.27%
QUS0.26%
SPYG0.18%
RSP0.17%
SPLG0.16%
SPY0.15%
ESGV0.15%
VOO0.15%
IVV0.15%
SPTM0.14%
VONE0.14%
SCHX0.13%
VTI0.13%
ITOT0.13%
SPYV0.13%
SCHB0.12%
URTH0.10%
ACWI0.09%
VT0.08%
ONEO0.05%

MSFT found in:

VGT10.02%
IVW9.10%
SPYG8.88%
IWF8.82%
IGV8.79%
VUG8.76%
VONG8.69%
MGK8.69%
XLK8.48%
SCHG7.34%
QQQ7.17%
SPLG6.84%
OEF6.73%
IVV6.14%
DGRW6.07%
ESGV5.53%
ITOT5.43%
DIA5.13%
QUAL5.04%
JEPQ4.91%
VOO4.90%
SPY4.87%
SCHX4.69%
VONE4.60%
IWB4.59%
LRGF4.52%
SPTM4.50%
SCHB4.39%
VTI4.36%
IYW3.99%
VIG3.96%
DFAC3.92%
URTH3.24%
ACWI3.17%
DGRO2.91%
VT2.69%
QUS2.65%
MOAT2.37%
XNTK2.02%
CLOU1.97%
USMV1.56%
VFMV1.40%
XSW0.73%
SDY0.41%
RSP0.18%
ONEO0.10%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

CDNS vs MSFT: Head-to-Head Analysis

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) represent two companies in the Technology sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, MSFT leads 6–3 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, CDNS generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 15.2% compared to MSFT's 20.8%. This suggests MSFT is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

The 252-day rolling correlation between CDNS and MSFT is 0.444, indicating moderate co-movement, with some diversification value from holding both in a portfolio context.

CDNS appears in 30 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while MSFT appears in 46 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, CDNS or MSFT?

Our quantitative analysis compares CDNS and MSFT across nine fundamental dimensions. MSFT wins the Tale of the Tape 6–3. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are CDNS and MSFT correlated?

The 252-day correlation between CDNS and MSFT is 0.444. They show moderate correlation — partially diversifying.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.