Stock vs Stock Comparison

Celsius Holdings, Inc. vs Costco Wholesale Corporation

COST wins the Tale of the Tape 5–4.

CELH
COST$961.83

🏆 Tale of the Tape

45
CELHCOST
4.3%Profitability (Net Margin)2.9%
137.4xValuation (P/E)49.8x
3.4%Efficiency (ROIC)21.7%
4/9Health (Piotroski F)6/9
3.3Safety (Altman Z)10.0
85.5%Growth (Rev YoY)8.2%
Risk (Sharpe 1Y)-0.05
0.74xBalance Sheet (D/E)1.64x
3.54%FCF Yield1.80%

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Fundamentals

MetricCELHCOST
Market Cap$8.9B$424.1B
P/E Ratio137.4x49.8x
Forward P/E16.7x42.3x
P/B7.47x25.65x
Dividend Yield0.61%
Beta0.960.91

Quantitative Metrics

MetricCELHCOST
DCF Fair Value$41.52$576.10
DCF Upside-41.3%
Piotroski F4/96/9
Altman Z3.2610.02
Beneish M-0.88-2.66
FCF Yield3.54%1.80%
Net Debt/EBITDA1.3x-0.6x
ROIC3.4%21.7%
WACC10.3%10.8%
ROIC – WACC-6.9pp10.9pp
Gross Margin50.4%12.8%
Net Margin4.3%2.9%
Rev Growth YoY85.5%8.2%
Sharpe (1Y)-0.05
Max Drawdown 3Y
FCF Payout Ratio12%28%

CELH Price

Loading chart...

COST Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

CELH found in:

VDC0.28%
MDYG0.27%
VBK0.19%
SPMD0.14%
MDY0.14%
VB0.08%
VXF0.07%
ONEO0.05%
VONG0.02%
SPTM0.01%

COST found in:

VDC12.27%
XLP9.78%
IYC4.26%
MGV2.23%
QQQ2.10%
VIG2.03%
SCHG1.70%
VFQY1.64%
SPYV1.62%
IWF1.60%
IVE1.58%
XRT1.51%
VONG1.45%
VFMV1.40%
VUG1.32%
QUS1.27%
ESGV0.89%
DGRW0.82%
VOO0.73%
SPY0.73%
SCHX0.72%
SPLG0.69%
VONE0.68%
SPTM0.67%
SCHB0.67%
IVV0.65%
VTI0.65%
ITOT0.58%
URTH0.52%
ACWI0.43%
VT0.40%
SDY0.23%
RSP0.21%
GWX0.11%
ONEO0.04%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

CELH vs COST: Head-to-Head Analysis

Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) represent two companies in the Consumer Defensive sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, COST leads 5–4 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, CELH generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 3.4% compared to COST's 21.7%. This suggests COST is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

CELH appears in 10 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while COST appears in 35 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, CELH or COST?

Our quantitative analysis compares CELH and COST across nine fundamental dimensions. COST wins the Tale of the Tape 5–4. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are CELH and COST correlated?

Correlation data is not yet available for this pair. Check back after both stocks have sufficient trading history.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.