Stock vs Stock Comparison

C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. vs American Battery Technology Company

CHRW wins the Tale of the Tape 7–2.

CHRW$180.74
ABAT

🏆 Tale of the Tape

72
CHRWABAT
3.6%Profitability (Net Margin)-1090.0%
36.2xValuation (P/E)
19.5%Efficiency (ROIC)-52.2%
7/9Health (Piotroski F)5/9
9.3Safety (Altman Z)
-8.4%Growth (Rev YoY)1149.0%
1.58Risk (Sharpe 1Y)
1.74xBalance Sheet (D/E)0.20x
4.15%FCF Yield

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Fundamentals

MetricCHRWABAT
Market Cap$21.1B
P/E Ratio36.2x
Forward P/E24.3x
P/B12.39x
Dividend Yield1.41%
Beta0.94

Quantitative Metrics

MetricCHRWABAT
DCF Fair Value$56.89
DCF Upside-65.5%
Piotroski F7/95/9
Altman Z9.26
Beneish M-2.845.95
FCF Yield4.15%
Net Debt/EBITDA1.0x
ROIC19.5%-52.2%
WACC10.3%
ROIC – WACC9.2pp
Gross Margin8.4%-246.5%
Net Margin3.6%-1090.0%
Rev Growth YoY-8.4%1149.0%
Sharpe (1Y)1.58
Max Drawdown 3Y
FCF Payout Ratio36%

CHRW Price

Loading chart...

ABAT Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

CHRW found in:

XTN2.30%
NOBL1.43%
ONEY0.65%
SDY0.63%
VBR0.49%
ONEV0.45%
VFMO0.45%
XLI0.40%
VIS0.30%
VB0.28%
VFQY0.28%
ONEO0.26%
RSP0.24%
DGRW0.16%
VIG0.10%
VYM0.09%
SCHV0.07%
SPYV0.07%
VONV0.07%
IWD0.06%
QUS0.05%
ESGV0.04%
SCHX0.04%
SPY0.03%
SCHB0.03%
IVV0.03%
SPTM0.03%
VOO0.03%
VONE0.03%
VTI0.03%
ITOT0.03%
SPLG0.03%
ACWI0.02%
URTH0.02%

ABAT found in:

XME0.50%
VFMO0.09%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

CHRW vs ABAT: Head-to-Head Analysis

C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) and American Battery Technology Company (ABAT) represent two companies in the Industrials sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, CHRW leads 7–2 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, CHRW generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 19.5% compared to ABAT's -52.2%. This suggests CHRW is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

CHRW appears in 34 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while ABAT appears in 2 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, CHRW or ABAT?

Our quantitative analysis compares CHRW and ABAT across nine fundamental dimensions. CHRW wins the Tale of the Tape 7–2. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are CHRW and ABAT correlated?

Correlation data is not yet available for this pair. Check back after both stocks have sufficient trading history.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.