Stock vs Stock Comparison

The Cigna Group vs AbCellera Biologics Inc.

CI wins the Tale of the Tape 7–2.

CI$270.73
ABCL

🏆 Tale of the Tape

72
CIABCL
2.2%Profitability (Net Margin)-194.9%
2.4xValuation (P/E)
4.6%Efficiency (ROIC)-12.4%
5/9Health (Piotroski F)4/9
2.7Safety (Altman Z)
12.5%Growth (Rev YoY)160.6%
-0.38Risk (Sharpe 1Y)
2.77xBalance Sheet (D/E)0.40x
8.77%FCF Yield

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Fundamentals

MetricCIABCL
Market Cap$73.4B
P/E Ratio2.4x
Forward P/E8.3x
P/B1.74x
Dividend Yield2.25%
Beta0.31

Quantitative Metrics

MetricCIABCL
DCF Fair Value$608.57
DCF Upside+121.2%
Piotroski F5/94/9
Altman Z2.73
Beneish M
FCF Yield8.77%
Net Debt/EBITDA1.9x
ROIC4.6%-12.4%
WACC6.8%
ROIC – WACC-2.2pp
Gross Margin
Net Margin2.2%-194.9%
Rev Growth YoY12.5%160.6%
Sharpe (1Y)-0.38
Max Drawdown 3Y
FCF Payout Ratio19%

CI Price

Loading chart...

ABCL Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

CI found in:

XHS1.94%
XLV1.39%
VHT1.26%
VFVA0.89%
ONEV0.78%
ONEO0.43%
MGV0.38%
VYM0.32%
VTV0.30%
SCHV0.26%
SPYV0.26%
QUS0.24%
VONV0.22%
IWD0.21%
RSP0.20%
ESGV0.14%
SPLG0.14%
IVV0.13%
SCHX0.12%
VONE0.12%
VOO0.12%
SCHB0.12%
SPY0.12%
ITOT0.11%
VTI0.11%
SPTM0.11%
URTH0.09%
ACWI0.07%
VT0.07%
IWF0.02%
VONG0.02%

ABCL found in:

GWX0.09%
SPDW0.01%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

CI vs ABCL: Head-to-Head Analysis

The Cigna Group (CI) and AbCellera Biologics Inc. (ABCL) represent two companies in the Healthcare sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, CI leads 7–2 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, CI generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 4.6% compared to ABCL's -12.4%. This suggests CI is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

CI appears in 31 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while ABCL appears in 2 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, CI or ABCL?

Our quantitative analysis compares CI and ABCL across nine fundamental dimensions. CI wins the Tale of the Tape 7–2. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are CI and ABCL correlated?

Correlation data is not yet available for this pair. Check back after both stocks have sufficient trading history.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.