Stock vs Stock Comparison

The Cooper Companies, Inc. vs Eli Lilly and Company

LLY wins the Tale of the Tape 6–3.

COO$60.34
LLY$1078.78

🏆 Tale of the Tape

36
COOLLY
9.2%Profitability (Net Margin)31.7%
30.5xValuation (P/E)39.2x
4.7%Efficiency (ROIC)30.4%
5/9Health (Piotroski F)7/9
3.5Safety (Altman Z)7.8
5.1%Growth (Rev YoY)44.7%
-0.23Risk (Sharpe 1Y)0.61
0.50xBalance Sheet (D/E)3.24x
2.67%FCF Yield0.68%

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Rolling Correlation

0.141
252-Day Correlation
0.192
126-Day Correlation

Low correlation — excellent diversification pair.

Fundamentals

MetricCOOLLY
Market Cap$11.9B$985.4B
P/E Ratio30.5x39.2x
Forward P/E12.2x24.8x
P/B1.43x31.65x
Dividend Yield0.63%
Beta0.890.48

Quantitative Metrics

MetricCOOLLY
DCF Fair Value$27.92$296.11
DCF Upside-61.1%-68.2%
Piotroski F5/97/9
Altman Z3.477.84
Beneish M-2.49-1.91
FCF Yield2.67%0.68%
Net Debt/EBITDA2.2x1.1x
ROIC4.7%30.4%
WACC10.3%7.8%
ROIC – WACC-5.7pp22.5pp
Gross Margin65.5%83.0%
Net Margin9.2%31.7%
Rev Growth YoY5.1%44.7%
Sharpe (1Y)-0.230.61
Max Drawdown 3Y
FCF Payout Ratio90%

COO Price

Loading chart...

LLY Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

COO found in:

XHE1.46%
VBR0.28%
XLV0.23%
VHT0.20%
RSP0.20%
VB0.16%
ONEV0.11%
SCHV0.06%
IWD0.05%
SPYV0.04%
VONV0.04%
ESGV0.03%
IVV0.03%
SCHX0.03%
SCHB0.02%
ITOT0.02%
SPLG0.02%
ONEO0.02%
VOO0.02%
SPY0.02%
URTH0.02%
SPTM0.02%
ACWI0.02%
QUS0.01%

LLY found in:

XLV15.40%
IYH13.72%
VHT12.15%
VIG3.33%
SCHG3.17%
QUAL2.92%
MGK2.82%
IWF2.66%
VONG2.42%
SPYG2.36%
VUG2.31%
IVW2.23%
QUS1.95%
XPH1.90%
ESGV1.48%
DGRW1.46%
IVV1.46%
SCHX1.34%
SPY1.29%
ITOT1.29%
SCHB1.25%
VFQY1.23%
VOO1.20%
SPTM1.20%
VTI1.14%
VONE1.14%
SPLG1.10%
ARKG1.04%
URTH0.99%
ACWI0.87%
VT0.66%
VFMO0.46%
RSP0.20%
ONEO0.02%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

COO vs LLY: Head-to-Head Analysis

The Cooper Companies, Inc. (COO) and Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) represent two companies in the Healthcare sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, LLY leads 6–3 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, COO generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 4.7% compared to LLY's 30.4%. This suggests LLY is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

The 252-day rolling correlation between COO and LLY is 0.141, indicating low correlation, making them an effective diversification pair in a portfolio context.

COO appears in 24 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while LLY appears in 34 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, COO or LLY?

Our quantitative analysis compares COO and LLY across nine fundamental dimensions. LLY wins the Tale of the Tape 6–3. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are COO and LLY correlated?

The 252-day correlation between COO and LLY is 0.141. They have low correlation, offering good diversification.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.