Stock vs Stock Comparison

Medtronic plc vs Abbott Laboratories

ABT wins the Tale of the Tape 6–3.

MDT$77.95
ABT$86.99

🏆 Tale of the Tape

36
MDTABT
13.9%Profitability (Net Margin)14.7%
20.6xValuation (P/E)24.0x
6.4%Efficiency (ROIC)10.1%
6/9Health (Piotroski F)5/9
2.8Safety (Altman Z)4.9
3.6%Growth (Rev YoY)5.7%
0.13Risk (Sharpe 1Y)-1.05
0.90xBalance Sheet (D/E)0.64x
3.83%FCF Yield4.21%

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Rolling Correlation

0.346
252-Day Correlation
0.317
126-Day Correlation

Moderately correlated — some diversification benefit from holding both.

Fundamentals

MetricMDTABT
Market Cap$94.8B$149.1B
P/E Ratio20.6x24.0x
Forward P/E12.2x14.1x
P/B1.93x2.86x
Dividend Yield3.85%2.94%
Beta0.630.65

Quantitative Metrics

MetricMDTABT
DCF Fair Value$38.30$57.20
DCF Upside-56.5%-43.2%
Piotroski F6/95/9
Altman Z2.774.87
Beneish M-2.58-2.53
FCF Yield3.83%4.21%
Net Debt/EBITDA2.5x0.1x
ROIC6.4%10.1%
WACC8.5%9.4%
ROIC – WACC-2.2pp0.7pp
Gross Margin65.3%56.4%
Net Margin13.9%14.7%
Rev Growth YoY3.6%5.7%
Sharpe (1Y)0.13-1.05
Max Drawdown 3Y
FCF Payout Ratio69%56%

MDT Price

Loading chart...

ABT Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

MDT found in:

IHI4.62%
XLV1.87%
HDV1.80%
VHT1.68%
XHE1.50%
SDY1.33%
VFVA0.54%
MGV0.52%
VIG0.47%
VFMV0.46%
VYM0.43%
VTV0.41%
SPYV0.35%
VONV0.32%
ESGV0.22%
SPLG0.20%
VOO0.17%
VONE0.16%
SPY0.16%
VTI0.15%
SPTM0.15%
QUS0.11%
ONEO0.10%
VT0.09%

ABT found in:

IHI16.06%
IYH2.88%
XLV2.85%
VHT2.55%
DGRW1.71%
XHE1.36%
NOBL1.34%
SDY0.99%
MGV0.78%
VIG0.71%
VFMV0.69%
SCHV0.68%
VYM0.65%
VTV0.61%
IWD0.58%
QUS0.57%
SPYV0.53%
VONV0.48%
IVV0.37%
SPLG0.37%
ESGV0.36%
ITOT0.33%
SCHX0.33%
SCHB0.30%
VOO0.26%
VONE0.24%
SPY0.24%
URTH0.24%
VTI0.23%
SPTM0.22%
ACWI0.20%
RSP0.17%
VT0.14%
ONEO0.08%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

MDT vs ABT: Head-to-Head Analysis

Medtronic plc (MDT) and Abbott Laboratories (ABT) represent two companies in the Healthcare sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, ABT leads 6–3 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, MDT generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 6.4% compared to ABT's 10.1%. This suggests ABT is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

The 252-day rolling correlation between MDT and ABT is 0.346, indicating moderate co-movement, with some diversification value from holding both in a portfolio context.

MDT appears in 24 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while ABT appears in 34 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, MDT or ABT?

Our quantitative analysis compares MDT and ABT across nine fundamental dimensions. ABT wins the Tale of the Tape 6–3. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are MDT and ABT correlated?

The 252-day correlation between MDT and ABT is 0.346. They show moderate correlation — partially diversifying.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.