Stock vs Stock Comparison

Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. vs Visa Inc.

V wins the Tale of the Tape 8–1.

MMC$173.97
V$317.32

🏆 Tale of the Tape

18
MMCV
Profitability (Net Margin)50.1%
21.9xValuation (P/E)28.5x
Efficiency (ROIC)30.3%
Health (Piotroski F)6/9
Safety (Altman Z)7.2
Growth (Rev YoY)11.3%
Risk (Sharpe 1Y)-0.43
Balance Sheet (D/E)1.63x
FCF Yield3.66%

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Rolling Correlation

0.535
252-Day Correlation
0.446
126-Day Correlation

Moderately correlated — some diversification benefit from holding both.

Fundamentals

MetricMMCV
Market Cap$89.8B$620.7B
P/E Ratio21.9x28.5x
Forward P/E17.7x22.0x
P/B5.91x16.29x
Dividend Yield0.02%0.82%
Beta0.750.78

Quantitative Metrics

MetricMMCV
DCF Fair Value$203.57
DCF Upside-34.2%
Piotroski F6/9
Altman Z7.17
Beneish M-2.62
FCF Yield3.66%
Net Debt/EBITDA0.1x
ROIC30.3%
WACC9.6%
ROIC – WACC20.7pp
Gross Margin80.4%
Net Margin50.1%
Rev Growth YoY11.3%
Sharpe (1Y)-0.43
Max Drawdown 3Y
FCF Payout Ratio21%

MMC Price

Loading chart...

V Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

MMC found in:

DGRW0.77%
SCHV0.31%
IWD0.24%
RSP0.20%
IVV0.16%
SPLG0.15%
SCHX0.15%
ITOT0.14%
SCHB0.14%
URTH0.11%
ACWI0.10%
IWF0.04%

V found in:

XLF7.55%
IYJ7.01%
VFH4.17%
DIA4.05%
QUAL3.08%
VIG2.33%
SCHG2.05%
QUS1.89%
MGK1.88%
IWF1.84%
VONG1.70%
VUG1.58%
DGRW1.53%
VFQY1.28%
ESGV1.02%
IVV1.01%
SPLG0.98%
ITOT0.89%
VOO0.88%
SPYG0.87%
SPY0.87%
SPYV0.87%
SCHX0.87%
VONE0.84%
SCHB0.81%
SPTM0.81%
VTI0.78%
URTH0.64%
ACWI0.57%
VT0.49%
RSP0.19%
VFMV0.13%
ONEO0.04%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

MMC vs V: Head-to-Head Analysis

Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC) and Visa Inc. (V) represent two companies in the Financial Services sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, V leads 8–1 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

The 252-day rolling correlation between MMC and V is 0.535, indicating moderate co-movement, with some diversification value from holding both in a portfolio context.

MMC appears in 12 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while V appears in 33 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, MMC or V?

Our quantitative analysis compares MMC and V across nine fundamental dimensions. V wins the Tale of the Tape 8–1. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are MMC and V correlated?

The 252-day correlation between MMC and V is 0.535. They show moderate correlation — partially diversifying.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.