Stock vs Stock Comparison

Waters Corporation vs AbbVie Inc.

ABBV wins the Tale of the Tape 5–4.

WAT$371.93
ABBV$217.13

🏆 Tale of the Tape

45
WATABBV
20.3%Profitability (Net Margin)6.9%
48.8xValuation (P/E)106.2x
17.0%Efficiency (ROIC)8.3%
4/9Health (Piotroski F)7/9
11.7Safety (Altman Z)2.0
7.0%Growth (Rev YoY)8.6%
-0.05Risk (Sharpe 1Y)0.61
0.98xBalance Sheet (D/E)-42.50x
1.70%FCF Yield4.23%

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Rolling Correlation

0.315
252-Day Correlation
0.092
126-Day Correlation

Moderately correlated — some diversification benefit from holding both.

Fundamentals

MetricWATABBV
Market Cap$37.7B$384.7B
P/E Ratio48.8x106.2x
Forward P/E23.4x13.4x
P/B8.92x-57.80x
Dividend Yield3.18%
Beta1.140.30

Quantitative Metrics

MetricWATABBV
DCF Fair Value$48.56$126.26
DCF Upside-85.0%-38.9%
Piotroski F4/97/9
Altman Z11.742.01
Beneish M-2.38-2.87
FCF Yield1.70%4.23%
Net Debt/EBITDA0.3x3.0x
ROIC17.0%8.3%
WACC12.0%7.4%
ROIC – WACC5.0pp0.8pp
Gross Margin59.3%70.2%
Net Margin20.3%6.9%
Rev Growth YoY7.0%8.6%
Sharpe (1Y)-0.050.61
Max Drawdown 3Y
FCF Payout Ratio65%

WAT Price

Loading chart...

ABBV Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

WAT found in:

VOT0.71%
XLV0.62%
VHT0.49%
VO0.31%
RSP0.18%
VFQY0.18%
ONEV0.13%
SCHG0.12%
SPYV0.12%
ONEO0.08%
IWD0.07%
VUG0.06%
VONV0.06%
ESGV0.06%
VTV0.06%
QUS0.06%
SPY0.05%
SCHX0.05%
VONE0.05%
VOO0.05%
SPTM0.05%
SCHB0.05%
VTI0.04%
IVV0.04%
URTH0.04%
SPLG0.03%
ITOT0.03%
IWF0.03%
VONG0.03%
ACWI0.02%

ABBV found in:

XLV7.07%
IYH6.86%
VHT6.04%
HDV5.61%
SCHD3.53%
DGRO2.52%
DGRW1.99%
MGV1.85%
VIG1.68%
VYM1.56%
NOBL1.49%
VTV1.46%
SDY1.42%
IWF1.39%
SCHV1.38%
VONG1.21%
XBI1.09%
ESGV0.78%
SPYV0.71%
IVV0.69%
SPLG0.68%
SCHX0.66%
SCHB0.62%
ITOT0.61%
VOO0.60%
SPY0.59%
VONE0.57%
SPTM0.55%
VTI0.54%
SPYG0.50%
URTH0.48%
ACWI0.41%
VFVA0.41%
VT0.33%
QUS0.32%
VFMV0.25%
RSP0.19%
ONEO0.03%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

WAT vs ABBV: Head-to-Head Analysis

Waters Corporation (WAT) and AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) represent two companies in the Healthcare sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, ABBV leads 5–4 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, WAT generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 17.0% compared to ABBV's 8.3%. This suggests WAT is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

The 252-day rolling correlation between WAT and ABBV is 0.315, indicating moderate co-movement, with some diversification value from holding both in a portfolio context.

WAT appears in 30 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while ABBV appears in 38 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, WAT or ABBV?

Our quantitative analysis compares WAT and ABBV across nine fundamental dimensions. ABBV wins the Tale of the Tape 5–4. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are WAT and ABBV correlated?

The 252-day correlation between WAT and ABBV is 0.315. They show moderate correlation — partially diversifying.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.