Stock vs Stock Comparison

Zscaler, Inc. vs Apple Inc.

AAPL wins the Tale of the Tape 6–3.

ZS$134.37
AAPL$310.26

🏆 Tale of the Tape

36
ZSAAPL
-1.6%Profitability (Net Margin)26.9%
Valuation (P/E)37.7x
-0.3%Efficiency (ROIC)54.3%
4/9Health (Piotroski F)8/9
3.1Safety (Altman Z)10.3
23.3%Growth (Rev YoY)6.4%
-1.03Risk (Sharpe 1Y)1.03
2.57xBalance Sheet (D/E)3.87x
3.97%FCF Yield2.55%

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Rolling Correlation

0.126
252-Day Correlation
0.094
126-Day Correlation

Low correlation — excellent diversification pair.

Fundamentals

MetricZSAAPL
Market Cap$22.6B$4.58T
P/E Ratio37.7x
Forward P/E30.4x32.5x
P/B9.55x42.98x
Dividend Yield0.35%
Beta0.961.06

Quantitative Metrics

MetricZSAAPL
DCF Fair Value$143.61$58.50
DCF Upside+17.1%-77.4%
Piotroski F4/98/9
Altman Z3.0810.31
Beneish M-3.00-2.37
FCF Yield3.97%2.55%
Net Debt/EBITDA-6.4x0.3x
ROIC-0.3%54.3%
WACC11.1%11.5%
ROIC – WACC-11.3pp42.8pp
Gross Margin76.9%46.9%
Net Margin-1.6%26.9%
Rev Growth YoY23.3%6.4%
Sharpe (1Y)-1.031.03
Max Drawdown 3Y-64.9%-33.4%
FCF Payout Ratio16%

ZS Price

Loading chart...

AAPL Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

ZS found in:

HACK4.14%
XSW0.78%
VOT0.32%
VXF0.16%
VO0.14%
VGT0.09%
ONEO0.08%
VUG0.05%
VONG0.04%
ESGV0.03%
QUS0.00%

AAPL found in:

VGT14.81%
IYW13.63%
XLK12.20%
MGK11.79%
IWF11.64%
VUG11.53%
VONG11.13%
SCHG9.82%
OEF8.85%
QQQ8.01%
SPYV7.77%
ESGV7.36%
SPY7.01%
IVE6.98%
IVV6.86%
SPLG6.80%
SPTM6.48%
VOO6.45%
SPYG6.39%
JEPQ6.29%
QUAL6.27%
SCHX6.27%
LRGF6.22%
ITOT6.07%
IVW5.99%
VONE5.95%
IWB5.94%
SCHB5.87%
DGRW5.74%
VTI5.74%
DFAC4.69%
URTH4.58%
VIG4.07%
ACWI4.01%
DIA3.73%
VT3.47%
QUS3.20%
DGRO2.93%
XNTK2.53%
VFQY1.64%
VFMV1.40%
RSP0.18%
ONEO0.18%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

ZS vs AAPL: Head-to-Head Analysis

Zscaler, Inc. (ZS) and Apple Inc. (AAPL) represent two companies in the Technology sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, AAPL leads 6–3 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, ZS generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of -0.3% compared to AAPL's 54.3%. This suggests AAPL is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

The 252-day rolling correlation between ZS and AAPL is 0.126, indicating low correlation, making them an effective diversification pair in a portfolio context.

ZS appears in 11 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while AAPL appears in 43 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, ZS or AAPL?

Our quantitative analysis compares ZS and AAPL across nine fundamental dimensions. AAPL wins the Tale of the Tape 6–3. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are ZS and AAPL correlated?

The 252-day correlation between ZS and AAPL is 0.126. They have low correlation, offering good diversification.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.