Stock vs Stock Comparison

Albemarle Corporation vs Linde plc

LIN wins the Tale of the Tape 5–3.

ALB$171.77
LIN$495.91

🏆 Tale of the Tape

35
ALBLIN
-9.9%Profitability (Net Margin)20.3%
Valuation (P/E)33.0x
-1.9%Efficiency (ROIC)10.3%
5/9Health (Piotroski F)5/9
2.7Safety (Altman Z)4.0
-4.4%Growth (Rev YoY)3.0%
2.14Risk (Sharpe 1Y)0.66
0.67xBalance Sheet (D/E)1.18x
3.15%FCF Yield2.05%

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Rolling Correlation

0.154
252-Day Correlation
0.092
126-Day Correlation

Low correlation — excellent diversification pair.

Fundamentals

MetricALBLIN
Market Cap$20.8B$230.1B
P/E Ratio33.0x
Forward P/E14.8x25.3x
P/B2.73x5.97x
Dividend Yield0.92%1.29%
Beta1.360.74

Quantitative Metrics

MetricALBLIN
DCF Fair Value$33.67$96.04
DCF Upside-81.8%-81.1%
Piotroski F5/95/9
Altman Z2.663.96
Beneish M-3.72-2.62
FCF Yield3.15%2.05%
Net Debt/EBITDA4.8x1.2x
ROIC-1.9%10.3%
WACC12.3%9.3%
ROIC – WACC-14.2pp1.1pp
Gross Margin13.0%48.8%
Net Margin-9.9%20.3%
Rev Growth YoY-4.4%3.0%
Sharpe (1Y)2.140.66
Max Drawdown 3Y
FCF Payout Ratio52%55%

ALB Price

Loading chart...

LIN Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

ALB found in:

LIT7.12%
IYM2.57%
XLB2.51%
VAW1.48%
NOBL1.38%
VBK0.34%
SDY0.33%
VB0.30%
VBR0.26%
RSP0.25%
VFMO0.24%
VIG0.10%
VYM0.10%
SCHV0.07%
VONV0.07%
SPYV0.07%
IWD0.07%
VOO0.04%
VONE0.04%
SCHX0.03%
SCHB0.03%
SPY0.03%
VTI0.03%
SPTM0.03%
IVV0.03%
ITOT0.03%
SPLG0.02%
ONEO0.01%

LIN found in:

IYM19.89%
VAW14.98%
XLB14.97%
MGV1.15%
VIG1.05%
VYM0.98%
VTV0.90%
SPYV0.83%
QUS0.76%
VONV0.72%
SDY0.57%
ESGV0.47%
VOO0.38%
SPY0.38%
VONE0.36%
SPTM0.35%
SPLG0.34%
VTI0.33%
VT0.21%
ONEO0.07%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

ALB vs LIN: Head-to-Head Analysis

Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and Linde plc (LIN) represent two companies in the Basic Materials sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, LIN leads 5–3 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, ALB generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of -1.9% compared to LIN's 10.3%. This suggests LIN is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

The 252-day rolling correlation between ALB and LIN is 0.154, indicating low correlation, making them an effective diversification pair in a portfolio context.

ALB appears in 28 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while LIN appears in 20 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, ALB or LIN?

Our quantitative analysis compares ALB and LIN across nine fundamental dimensions. LIN wins the Tale of the Tape 5–3. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are ALB and LIN correlated?

The 252-day correlation between ALB and LIN is 0.154. They have low correlation, offering good diversification.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.