Stock vs Stock Comparison

Loews Corporation vs Arch Capital Group Ltd.

ACGL wins the Tale of the Tape 7–2.

L$104.93
ACGL$87.62

🏆 Tale of the Tape

27
LACGL
9.2%Profitability (Net Margin)22.8%
13.2xValuation (P/E)6.9x
2.5%Efficiency (ROIC)5.1%
7/9Health (Piotroski F)5/9
0.8Safety (Altman Z)1.3
5.4%Growth (Rev YoY)14.0%
1.38Risk (Sharpe 1Y)0.16
3.40xBalance Sheet (D/E)2.27x
8.85%FCF Yield17.06%

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Rolling Correlation

0.650
252-Day Correlation
0.633
126-Day Correlation

Moderately correlated — some diversification benefit from holding both.

Fundamentals

MetricLACGL
Market Cap$21.3B$31.2B
P/E Ratio13.2x6.9x
Forward P/E35.7x9.0x
P/B1.14x1.34x
Dividend Yield0.24%
Beta0.560.33

Quantitative Metrics

MetricLACGL
DCF Fair Value$273.37$453.32
DCF Upside+148.0%+366.9%
Piotroski F7/95/9
Altman Z0.801.31
Beneish M
FCF Yield8.85%17.06%
Net Debt/EBITDA2.4x0.3x
ROIC2.5%5.1%
WACC7.3%7.7%
ROIC – WACC-4.8pp-2.6pp
Gross Margin
Net Margin9.2%22.8%
Rev Growth YoY5.4%14.0%
Sharpe (1Y)1.380.16
Max Drawdown 3Y-22.4%
FCF Payout Ratio2%1%

L Price

Loading chart...

ACGL Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

L found in:

KIE1.77%
VFMV1.38%
VIGI0.47%
VOE0.33%
XLF0.25%
ONEV0.24%
VFH0.24%
RSP0.20%
VO0.19%
CWI0.16%
QUS0.14%
SPDW0.10%
ONEO0.09%
VSGX0.09%
VEA0.08%
VTV0.07%
SPYV0.06%
SCHV0.06%
VONV0.06%
VXUS0.06%
VEU0.06%
IWD0.06%
IVV0.03%
VOO0.03%
VTI0.03%
VONE0.03%
SCHX0.03%
SPTM0.03%
SPY0.03%
SPLG0.03%
SCHB0.03%
ITOT0.03%
URTH0.02%
ACWI0.02%

ACGL found in:

KIE1.79%
ONEV0.96%
VOE0.57%
XLF0.47%
VFH0.41%
ONEO0.33%
VO0.32%
QUS0.21%
VFVA0.16%
VTV0.12%
SPYV0.12%
VONV0.10%
ESGV0.07%
SPLG0.05%
SPY0.05%
SPTM0.05%
VOO0.05%
VTI0.05%
VONE0.05%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

L vs ACGL: Head-to-Head Analysis

Loews Corporation (L) and Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) represent two companies in the Financial Services sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, ACGL leads 7–2 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, L generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 2.5% compared to ACGL's 5.1%. This suggests ACGL is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

The 252-day rolling correlation between L and ACGL is 0.650, indicating moderate co-movement, with some diversification value from holding both in a portfolio context.

L appears in 34 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while ACGL appears in 19 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, L or ACGL?

Our quantitative analysis compares L and ACGL across nine fundamental dimensions. ACGL wins the Tale of the Tape 7–2. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are L and ACGL correlated?

The 252-day correlation between L and ACGL is 0.650. They show moderate correlation — partially diversifying.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.