CareDx, Inc. vs Abbott Laboratories
CDNA and ABT are evenly matched across key metrics.
🏆 Tale of the Tape
Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).
Rolling Correlation
Low correlation — excellent diversification pair.
Fundamentals
| Metric | CDNA | ABT |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.2B | $149.1B |
| P/E Ratio | — | 24.0x |
| Forward P/E | 20.1x | 14.1x |
| P/B | 3.73x | 2.86x |
| Dividend Yield | — | 2.94% |
| Beta | 2.49 | 0.65 |
Quantitative Metrics
| Metric | CDNA | ABT |
|---|---|---|
| DCF Fair Value | $6.84 | $57.20 |
| DCF Upside | -59.4% | -43.2% |
| Piotroski F | 5/9 | 5/9 |
| Altman Z | 3.21 | 4.87 |
| Beneish M | -3.32 | -2.53 |
| FCF Yield | 4.55% | 4.21% |
| Net Debt/EBITDA | — | 0.1x |
| ROIC | -6.1% | 10.1% |
| WACC | 19.9% | 9.4% |
| ROIC – WACC | -26.0pp | 0.7pp |
| Gross Margin | 67.5% | 56.4% |
| Net Margin | -5.6% | 14.7% |
| Rev Growth YoY | 13.8% | 5.7% |
| Sharpe (1Y) | 0.13 | -1.05 |
| Max Drawdown 3Y | -66.0% | — |
| FCF Payout Ratio | — | 56% |
CDNA Price
ABT Price
ETF Exposure
ABT found in:
More Comparisons
Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.
CDNA vs ABT: Head-to-Head Analysis
CareDx, Inc. (CDNA) and Abbott Laboratories (ABT) represent two companies in the Healthcare sector. Our quantitative Tale of the Tape shows these companies are evenly matched across profitability, valuation, and risk metrics.
In terms of capital efficiency, CDNA generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of -6.1% compared to ABT's 10.1%. This suggests ABT is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.
The 252-day rolling correlation between CDNA and ABT is 0.268, indicating low correlation, making them an effective diversification pair in a portfolio context.
CDNA appears in 3 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while ABT appears in 34 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which stock is the better investment, CDNA or ABT?
Our quantitative analysis compares CDNA and ABT across nine fundamental dimensions. CDNA and ABT are evenly matched across key metrics. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.
Are CDNA and ABT correlated?
The 252-day correlation between CDNA and ABT is 0.268. They have low correlation, offering good diversification.
How is the Tale of the Tape scored?
The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.