Stock vs Stock Comparison

Ecolab Inc. vs BHP Group Limited

BHP wins the Tale of the Tape 6–3.

ECL$255.67
BHP$90.85

🏆 Tale of the Tape

36
ECLBHP
12.9%Profitability (Net Margin)17.6%
34.6xValuation (P/E)22.1x
11.8%Efficiency (ROIC)17.2%
5/9Health (Piotroski F)4/9
4.9Safety (Altman Z)3.8
2.2%Growth (Rev YoY)-7.9%
0.63Risk (Sharpe 1Y)2.01
1.52xBalance Sheet (D/E)1.08x
2.27%FCF Yield4.57%

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Rolling Correlation

0.283
252-Day Correlation
0.327
126-Day Correlation

Low correlation — excellent diversification pair.

Fundamentals

MetricECLBHP
Market Cap$72.0B$225.9B
P/E Ratio34.6x22.1x
Forward P/E26.6x16.7x
P/B7.20x4.48x
Dividend Yield1.14%2.99%
Beta0.930.80

Quantitative Metrics

MetricECLBHP
DCF Fair Value$136.43$19.51
DCF Upside-50.4%-75.0%
Piotroski F5/94/9
Altman Z4.893.78
Beneish M-2.46-2.88
FCF Yield2.27%4.57%
Net Debt/EBITDA1.8x0.3x
ROIC11.8%17.2%
WACC10.5%9.2%
ROIC – WACC1.3pp7.9pp
Gross Margin44.5%71.7%
Net Margin12.9%17.6%
Rev Growth YoY2.2%-7.9%
Sharpe (1Y)0.632.01
Max Drawdown 3Y-37.2%
FCF Payout Ratio40%69%

ECL Price

Loading chart...

BHP Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

ECL found in:

IYM5.80%
VAW4.25%
XLB4.03%
NOBL1.53%
SDY0.43%
DGRW0.41%
MGK0.40%
VIG0.30%
SCHV0.27%
SPYV0.22%
RSP0.21%
VUG0.21%
IWD0.16%
VONV0.15%
SCHX0.13%
SCHB0.12%
IVV0.11%
SPLG0.11%
VOO0.11%
ITOT0.10%
VTI0.10%
VONE0.10%
SPY0.10%
ONEO0.10%
SPTM0.09%
URTH0.09%
EWX0.09%
ACWI0.08%
VT0.06%
IWF0.06%
VONG0.05%
QUS0.02%

BHP found in:

VPL1.61%
VYMI1.05%
SPDW0.65%
VEA0.61%
CWI0.59%
VEU0.49%
VXUS0.17%
VT0.17%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

ECL vs BHP: Head-to-Head Analysis

Ecolab Inc. (ECL) and BHP Group Limited (BHP) represent two companies in the Basic Materials sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, BHP leads 6–3 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, ECL generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 11.8% compared to BHP's 17.2%. This suggests BHP is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

The 252-day rolling correlation between ECL and BHP is 0.283, indicating low correlation, making them an effective diversification pair in a portfolio context.

ECL appears in 32 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while BHP appears in 8 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, ECL or BHP?

Our quantitative analysis compares ECL and BHP across nine fundamental dimensions. BHP wins the Tale of the Tape 6–3. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are ECL and BHP correlated?

The 252-day correlation between ECL and BHP is 0.283. They have low correlation, offering good diversification.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.