Stock vs Stock Comparison

Diamondback Energy, Inc. vs Antero Midstream Corporation

AM wins the Tale of the Tape 6–3.

FANG$210.59
AM

🏆 Tale of the Tape

36
FANGAM
11.2%Profitability (Net Margin)32.8%
195.4xValuation (P/E)27.0x
2.5%Efficiency (ROIC)10.3%
5/9Health (Piotroski F)8/9
1.5Safety (Altman Z)2.4
35.4%Growth (Rev YoY)7.0%
1.14Risk (Sharpe 1Y)
0.65xBalance Sheet (D/E)1.98x
-1.06%FCF Yield5.46%

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Fundamentals

MetricFANGAM
Market Cap$53.9B$11.1B
P/E Ratio195.4x27.0x
Forward P/E11.0x15.7x
P/B1.48x5.59x
Dividend Yield2.30%3.88%
Beta0.440.75

Quantitative Metrics

MetricFANGAM
DCF Fair Value$72.04
DCF Upside
Piotroski F5/98/9
Altman Z1.492.39
Beneish M-2.96-2.91
FCF Yield-1.06%5.46%
Net Debt/EBITDA1.9x3.2x
ROIC2.5%10.3%
WACC7.2%8.2%
ROIC – WACC-4.6pp2.1pp
Gross Margin35.0%65.3%
Net Margin11.2%32.8%
Rev Growth YoY35.4%7.0%
Sharpe (1Y)1.14
Max Drawdown 3Y
FCF Payout Ratio57%

FANG Price

Loading chart...

AM Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

FANG found in:

XOP2.91%
XLE2.14%
VDE1.51%
VOE0.72%
VO0.41%
VFVA0.33%
QQQ0.24%
RSP0.20%
VYM0.17%
VTV0.16%
SPYV0.14%
IWD0.13%
VONV0.12%
SCHV0.11%
QUS0.06%
SPY0.06%
VONE0.06%
VOO0.06%
VTI0.06%
SCHX0.05%
SPTM0.05%
SCHB0.05%
IVV0.05%
SPLG0.05%
ITOT0.04%
VT0.04%
DGRW0.04%
URTH0.04%
ACWI0.03%
ONEO0.01%

AM found in:

MDYG0.41%
VDE0.33%
SPMD0.21%
MDY0.21%
ONEY0.18%
VBR0.16%
HDV0.14%
VB0.09%
VXF0.09%
ONEO0.07%
ONEV0.07%
VFMO0.06%
VGK0.04%
VYM0.03%
SPDW0.02%
SPTM0.01%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

FANG vs AM: Head-to-Head Analysis

Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) and Antero Midstream Corporation (AM) represent two companies in the Energy sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, AM leads 6–3 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, FANG generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 2.5% compared to AM's 10.3%. This suggests AM is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

FANG appears in 30 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while AM appears in 16 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, FANG or AM?

Our quantitative analysis compares FANG and AM across nine fundamental dimensions. AM wins the Tale of the Tape 6–3. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are FANG and AM correlated?

Correlation data is not yet available for this pair. Check back after both stocks have sufficient trading history.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.