Stock vs Stock Comparison

Diamondback Energy, Inc. vs Exxon Mobil Corporation

FANG and XOM are evenly matched across key metrics.

FANG$195.54
XOM$147.36

🏆 Tale of the Tape

44
FANGXOM
11.2%Profitability (Net Margin)8.9%
191.7xValuation (P/E)24.8x
2.5%Efficiency (ROIC)8.8%
5/9Health (Piotroski F)5/9
1.5Safety (Altman Z)4.6
35.4%Growth (Rev YoY)-4.5%
1.22Risk (Sharpe 1Y)1.11
0.65xBalance Sheet (D/E)0.68x
-1.02%FCF Yield3.76%

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Rolling Correlation

0.691
252-Day Correlation
0.718
126-Day Correlation

Moderately correlated — some diversification benefit from holding both.

Fundamentals

MetricFANGXOM
Market Cap$55.0B$610.8B
P/E Ratio191.7x24.8x
Forward P/E11.3x13.9x
P/B1.51x2.40x
Dividend Yield2.31%2.82%
Beta0.410.16

Quantitative Metrics

MetricFANGXOM
DCF Fair Value$41.47
DCF Upside-71.9%
Piotroski F5/95/9
Altman Z1.534.57
Beneish M-2.96-2.73
FCF Yield-1.02%3.76%
Net Debt/EBITDA1.9x0.3x
ROIC2.5%8.8%
WACC7.2%7.8%
ROIC – WACC-4.7pp1.0pp
Gross Margin35.0%22.0%
Net Margin11.2%8.9%
Rev Growth YoY35.4%-4.5%
Sharpe (1Y)1.221.11
Max Drawdown 3Y
FCF Payout Ratio73%

FANG Price

Loading chart...

XOM Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

FANG found in:

XOP2.44%
XLE2.39%
VDE1.46%
VOE0.60%
ONEY0.42%
VO0.33%
VFVA0.33%
QQQ0.32%
RSP0.22%
ONEO0.19%
VYM0.14%
VTV0.13%
IWD0.13%
SPYV0.12%
SCHV0.11%
VONV0.09%
SPY0.06%
DGRW0.05%
SCHX0.05%
VOO0.05%
VONE0.05%
VTI0.05%
SPTM0.05%
SCHB0.05%
IVV0.05%
SPLG0.05%
ITOT0.04%
QUS0.04%
URTH0.04%
ACWI0.04%

XOM found in:

IYE22.29%
XLE20.20%
HDV8.42%
DGRW3.50%
MTUM2.89%
DGRO2.60%
XOP2.44%
VYM2.36%
IWD2.36%
SCHV2.17%
SPYV2.04%
IVE1.95%
NOBL1.58%
VFMV1.28%
SCHX1.03%
QUS1.00%
DVY0.99%
SDY0.97%
SCHB0.97%
SPY0.93%
SPTM0.86%
SPLG0.84%
IVV0.84%
VTI0.78%
URTH0.76%
ITOT0.74%
ACWI0.65%
VFMO0.52%
RSP0.20%
ONEO0.06%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

FANG vs XOM: Head-to-Head Analysis

Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) represent two companies in the Energy sector. Our quantitative Tale of the Tape shows these companies are evenly matched across profitability, valuation, and risk metrics.

In terms of capital efficiency, FANG generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 2.5% compared to XOM's 8.8%. This suggests XOM is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

The 252-day rolling correlation between FANG and XOM is 0.691, indicating moderate co-movement, with some diversification value from holding both in a portfolio context.

FANG appears in 30 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while XOM appears in 30 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, FANG or XOM?

Our quantitative analysis compares FANG and XOM across nine fundamental dimensions. FANG and XOM are evenly matched across key metrics. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are FANG and XOM correlated?

The 252-day correlation between FANG and XOM is 0.691. They show moderate correlation — partially diversifying.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.