Stock vs Stock Comparison

International Business Machines Corporation vs Axcelis Technologies, Inc.

IBM wins the Tale of the Tape 5–4.

IBM$305.63
ACLS

🏆 Tale of the Tape

54
IBMACLS
15.7%Profitability (Net Margin)14.3%
26.4xValuation (P/E)24.1x
8.6%Efficiency (ROIC)9.8%
6/9Health (Piotroski F)5/9
3.2Safety (Altman Z)7.3
7.6%Growth (Rev YoY)-17.6%
0.12Risk (Sharpe 1Y)
3.64xBalance Sheet (D/E)0.32x
4.44%FCF Yield3.95%

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Fundamentals

MetricIBMACLS
Market Cap$279.9B$2.8B
P/E Ratio26.4x24.1x
Forward P/E22.1x20.3x
P/B8.49x2.72x
Dividend Yield2.27%
Beta0.581.76

Quantitative Metrics

MetricIBMACLS
DCF Fair Value$134.84$24.44
DCF Upside-43.3%
Piotroski F6/95/9
Altman Z3.227.31
Beneish M-2.40-2.07
FCF Yield4.44%3.95%
Net Debt/EBITDA2.4x-0.6x
ROIC8.6%9.8%
WACC8.1%15.4%
ROIC – WACC0.5pp-5.7pp
Gross Margin58.2%44.9%
Net Margin15.7%14.3%
Rev Growth YoY7.6%-17.6%
Sharpe (1Y)0.12
Max Drawdown 3Y
FCF Payout Ratio55%

IBM Price

Loading chart...

ACLS Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

IBM found in:

DIA3.09%
XNTK1.89%
XLK1.57%
SDY1.17%
NOBL1.12%
MGV1.07%
VGT0.98%
VIG0.97%
VYM0.90%
DVY0.89%
VTV0.84%
SCHV0.76%
IWD0.74%
XSW0.71%
VONV0.66%
VFMV0.52%
SPLG0.49%
IVV0.47%
DGRW0.47%
QUS0.46%
ITOT0.42%
SPYV0.39%
SPY0.37%
SCHX0.36%
SPYG0.35%
VOO0.35%
SPTM0.34%
SCHB0.34%
VONE0.33%
VTI0.31%
CLOU0.30%
ACWI0.30%
URTH0.26%
RSP0.19%
VT0.19%
VFVA0.16%
ONEO0.06%

ACLS found in:

SLY0.59%
SLYG0.36%
SPSM0.28%
SLYV0.20%
VTWO0.13%
VBR0.10%
VGT0.07%
SPTM0.01%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

IBM vs ACLS: Head-to-Head Analysis

International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) and Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (ACLS) represent two companies in the Technology sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, IBM leads 5–4 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, IBM generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 8.6% compared to ACLS's 9.8%. This suggests ACLS is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

IBM appears in 37 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while ACLS appears in 8 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, IBM or ACLS?

Our quantitative analysis compares IBM and ACLS across nine fundamental dimensions. IBM wins the Tale of the Tape 5–4. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are IBM and ACLS correlated?

Correlation data is not yet available for this pair. Check back after both stocks have sufficient trading history.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.