Stock vs Stock Comparison

Illumina, Inc. vs Abbott Laboratories

ILMN wins the Tale of the Tape 5–4.

ILMN$170.93
ABT$86.99

🏆 Tale of the Tape

54
ILMNABT
19.6%Profitability (Net Margin)14.7%
29.6xValuation (P/E)24.0x
18.5%Efficiency (ROIC)10.1%
7/9Health (Piotroski F)5/9
4.3Safety (Altman Z)4.9
-0.7%Growth (Rev YoY)5.7%
1.20Risk (Sharpe 1Y)-1.05
1.44xBalance Sheet (D/E)0.64x
5.02%FCF Yield4.21%

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Rolling Correlation

0.077
252-Day Correlation
0.042
126-Day Correlation

Low correlation — excellent diversification pair.

Fundamentals

MetricILMNABT
Market Cap$24.7B$149.1B
P/E Ratio29.6x24.0x
Forward P/E27.5x14.1x
P/B9.26x2.86x
Dividend Yield2.94%
Beta1.420.65

Quantitative Metrics

MetricILMNABT
DCF Fair Value$107.79$57.20
DCF Upside-15.1%-43.2%
Piotroski F7/95/9
Altman Z4.304.87
Beneish M-2.50-2.53
FCF Yield5.02%4.21%
Net Debt/EBITDA0.0x0.1x
ROIC18.5%10.1%
WACC13.2%9.4%
ROIC – WACC5.3pp0.7pp
Gross Margin66.1%56.4%
Net Margin19.6%14.7%
Rev Growth YoY-0.7%5.7%
Sharpe (1Y)1.20-1.05
Max Drawdown 3Y-68.9%
FCF Payout Ratio56%

ILMN Price

Loading chart...

ABT Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

ILMN found in:

ARKG4.52%
ARKK1.36%
MDYG0.67%
SPMD0.64%
MDY0.64%
MDYV0.61%
VBR0.42%
VFQY0.35%
VHT0.31%
VB0.24%
VXF0.24%
VFMO0.10%
VONV0.06%
ESGV0.04%
SPTM0.03%
VTI0.03%
VONE0.03%
ONEO0.02%
QUS0.01%

ABT found in:

IHI16.06%
IYH2.88%
XLV2.85%
VHT2.55%
DGRW1.71%
XHE1.36%
NOBL1.34%
SDY0.99%
MGV0.78%
VIG0.71%
VFMV0.69%
SCHV0.68%
VYM0.65%
VTV0.61%
IWD0.58%
QUS0.57%
SPYV0.53%
VONV0.48%
IVV0.37%
SPLG0.37%
ESGV0.36%
ITOT0.33%
SCHX0.33%
SCHB0.30%
VOO0.26%
VONE0.24%
SPY0.24%
URTH0.24%
VTI0.23%
SPTM0.22%
ACWI0.20%
RSP0.17%
VT0.14%
ONEO0.08%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

ILMN vs ABT: Head-to-Head Analysis

Illumina, Inc. (ILMN) and Abbott Laboratories (ABT) represent two companies in the Healthcare sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, ILMN leads 5–4 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, ILMN generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 18.5% compared to ABT's 10.1%. This suggests ILMN is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

The 252-day rolling correlation between ILMN and ABT is 0.077, indicating low correlation, making them an effective diversification pair in a portfolio context.

ILMN appears in 19 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while ABT appears in 34 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, ILMN or ABT?

Our quantitative analysis compares ILMN and ABT across nine fundamental dimensions. ILMN wins the Tale of the Tape 5–4. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are ILMN and ABT correlated?

The 252-day correlation between ILMN and ABT is 0.077. They have low correlation, offering good diversification.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.