Stock vs Stock Comparison

Lowe's Companies, Inc. vs Airbnb, Inc.

ABNB wins the Tale of the Tape 5–3.

LOW$208.73
ABNB$145.98

🏆 Tale of the Tape

35
LOWABNB
7.7%Profitability (Net Margin)20.5%
18.3xValuation (P/E)36.5x
23.4%Efficiency (ROIC)23.5%
5/9Health (Piotroski F)5/9
3.1Safety (Altman Z)4.6
3.1%Growth (Rev YoY)10.3%
-0.13Risk (Sharpe 1Y)0.21
-6.46xBalance Sheet (D/E)1.71x
4.98%FCF Yield

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Rolling Correlation

0.269
252-Day Correlation
0.261
126-Day Correlation

Low correlation — excellent diversification pair.

Fundamentals

MetricLOWABNB
Market Cap$117.0B$86.6B
P/E Ratio18.3x36.5x
Forward P/E15.5x24.2x
P/B-12.81x11.37x
Dividend Yield2.31%
Beta0.851.14

Quantitative Metrics

MetricLOWABNB
DCF Fair Value$209.74
DCF Upside+0.5%
Piotroski F5/95/9
Altman Z3.074.57
Beneish M8.81-2.87
FCF Yield4.98%
Net Debt/EBITDA2.9x
ROIC23.4%23.5%
WACC8.6%
ROIC – WACC14.8pp
Gross Margin33.5%83.0%
Net Margin7.7%20.5%
Rev Growth YoY3.1%10.3%
Sharpe (1Y)-0.130.21
Max Drawdown 3Y
FCF Payout Ratio34%

LOW Price

Loading chart...

ABNB Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

LOW found in:

XHB3.18%
XLY3.01%
VCR1.83%
NOBL1.32%
SDY0.71%
MGV0.58%
VIG0.54%
VYM0.51%
SCHV0.50%
VTV0.46%
IWD0.44%
SPYV0.41%
VONV0.35%
ESGV0.27%
VFVA0.27%
IVV0.25%
SCHX0.24%
SPLG0.23%
SCHB0.22%
ITOT0.22%
VOO0.19%
SPY0.19%
RSP0.19%
VONE0.18%
SPTM0.17%
URTH0.17%
VTI0.17%
ACWI0.13%
VT0.11%
QUS0.10%
ONEO0.03%

ABNB found in:

MOAT2.64%
ARKF1.68%
XLY1.54%
VFQY1.37%
VCR0.94%
VFMV0.93%
ARKW0.56%
MGK0.37%
QQQ0.30%
SCHG0.22%
RSP0.20%
IWF0.19%
VONG0.18%
ONEO0.17%
VUG0.17%
SPYV0.11%
ESGV0.11%
SPY0.10%
SPLG0.09%
SCHX0.09%
IVV0.09%
VONE0.09%
VOO0.09%
SCHB0.09%
SPTM0.09%
SPYG0.08%
ITOT0.08%
VTI0.08%
URTH0.07%
ACWI0.06%
VT0.05%
QUS0.03%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

LOW vs ABNB: Head-to-Head Analysis

Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW) and Airbnb, Inc. (ABNB) represent two companies in the Consumer Cyclical sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, ABNB leads 5–3 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, LOW generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 23.4% compared to ABNB's 23.5%. This suggests ABNB is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

The 252-day rolling correlation between LOW and ABNB is 0.269, indicating low correlation, making them an effective diversification pair in a portfolio context.

LOW appears in 31 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while ABNB appears in 32 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, LOW or ABNB?

Our quantitative analysis compares LOW and ABNB across nine fundamental dimensions. ABNB wins the Tale of the Tape 5–3. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are LOW and ABNB correlated?

The 252-day correlation between LOW and ABNB is 0.269. They have low correlation, offering good diversification.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.