Stock vs Stock Comparison

Lowe's Companies, Inc. vs Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.

LOW wins the Tale of the Tape 5–4.

LOW$207.65
ABG

🏆 Tale of the Tape

54
LOWABG
7.7%Profitability (Net Margin)2.7%
18.1xValuation (P/E)7.9x
23.4%Efficiency (ROIC)9.2%
5/9Health (Piotroski F)6/9
3.3Safety (Altman Z)2.5
3.1%Growth (Rev YoY)4.7%
0.42Risk (Sharpe 1Y)
-6.46xBalance Sheet (D/E)1.99x
4.41%FCF Yield8.28%

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Fundamentals

MetricLOWABG
Market Cap$120.2B$3.8B
P/E Ratio18.1x7.9x
Forward P/E15.9x6.7x
P/B-12.97x0.98x
Dividend Yield2.24%
Beta0.900.77

Quantitative Metrics

MetricLOWABG
DCF Fair Value$178.49$788.29
DCF Upside-27.8%
Piotroski F5/96/9
Altman Z3.262.53
Beneish M8.81-2.60
FCF Yield4.41%8.28%
Net Debt/EBITDA2.9x3.0x
ROIC23.4%9.2%
WACC9.3%7.1%
ROIC – WACC14.1pp2.1pp
Gross Margin33.5%17.1%
Net Margin7.7%2.7%
Rev Growth YoY3.1%4.7%
Sharpe (1Y)0.42
Max Drawdown 3Y
FCF Payout Ratio34%

LOW Price

Loading chart...

ABG Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

LOW found in:

XHB3.12%
XLY2.79%
VCR2.01%
NOBL1.32%
SDY0.75%
MGV0.66%
VIG0.60%
VYM0.56%
VTV0.52%
SCHV0.50%
IWD0.44%
SPYV0.42%
VONV0.41%
VFVA0.27%
ESGV0.27%
SCHX0.24%
IVV0.23%
SPLG0.23%
SCHB0.22%
VOO0.22%
RSP0.21%
ITOT0.20%
VONE0.20%
SPY0.19%
VTI0.19%
SPTM0.18%
URTH0.17%
ACWI0.15%
VT0.12%
QUS0.09%
ONEO0.09%

ABG found in:

XRT1.32%
SLY0.53%
SLYV0.43%
SPSM0.22%
DEM0.19%
VFVA0.15%
VTWO0.12%
VCR0.10%
SPEM0.10%
VWO0.09%
VBR0.09%
VYMI0.06%
VSGX0.04%
GWX0.04%
VNQI0.03%
CWI0.02%
SPTM0.01%
SPDW0.00%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

LOW vs ABG: Head-to-Head Analysis

Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW) and Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. (ABG) represent two companies in the Consumer Cyclical sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, LOW leads 5–4 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, LOW generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 23.4% compared to ABG's 9.2%. This suggests LOW is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

LOW appears in 31 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while ABG appears in 18 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, LOW or ABG?

Our quantitative analysis compares LOW and ABG across nine fundamental dimensions. LOW wins the Tale of the Tape 5–4. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are LOW and ABG correlated?

Correlation data is not yet available for this pair. Check back after both stocks have sufficient trading history.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.