Stock vs Stock Comparison

Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. vs Linde plc

MLM wins the Tale of the Tape 5–4.

MLM$583.15
LIN$507.57

🏆 Tale of the Tape

54
MLMLIN
18.5%Profitability (Net Margin)20.3%
36.5xValuation (P/E)33.0x
6.5%Efficiency (ROIC)10.3%
8/9Health (Piotroski F)5/9
3.8Safety (Altman Z)4.0
8.6%Growth (Rev YoY)3.0%
1.09Risk (Sharpe 1Y)0.66
0.86xBalance Sheet (D/E)1.18x
2.26%FCF Yield2.05%

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Rolling Correlation

0.366
252-Day Correlation
0.226
126-Day Correlation

Moderately correlated — some diversification benefit from holding both.

Fundamentals

MetricMLMLIN
Market Cap$34.9B$230.1B
P/E Ratio36.5x33.0x
Forward P/E25.3x25.3x
P/B3.09x5.97x
Dividend Yield0.57%1.29%
Beta1.140.74

Quantitative Metrics

MetricMLMLIN
DCF Fair Value$400.23$96.04
DCF Upside-37.0%-81.1%
Piotroski F8/95/9
Altman Z3.853.96
Beneish M-2.67-2.62
FCF Yield2.26%2.05%
Net Debt/EBITDA2.5x1.2x
ROIC6.5%10.3%
WACC11.1%9.3%
ROIC – WACC-4.7pp1.1pp
Gross Margin30.7%48.8%
Net Margin18.5%20.3%
Rev Growth YoY8.6%3.0%
Sharpe (1Y)1.090.66
Max Drawdown 3Y
FCF Payout Ratio20%55%

MLM Price

Loading chart...

LIN Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

MLM found in:

XLB4.02%
VAW2.39%
VOT0.88%
VO0.38%
RSP0.20%
VIG0.17%
SCHG0.15%
IWD0.12%
SPYV0.11%
VONV0.11%
VTV0.07%
VUG0.07%
SCHX0.07%
IVV0.06%
SPLG0.06%
SCHB0.06%
ONEO0.06%
VOO0.06%
VONE0.06%
ITOT0.06%
SPY0.05%
VTI0.05%
SPTM0.05%
URTH0.05%
ACWI0.04%
DGRW0.04%
VT0.03%
QUS0.02%

LIN found in:

IYM19.89%
VAW14.98%
XLB14.97%
MGV1.15%
VIG1.05%
VYM0.98%
VTV0.90%
SPYV0.83%
QUS0.76%
VONV0.72%
SDY0.57%
ESGV0.47%
VOO0.38%
SPY0.38%
VONE0.36%
SPTM0.35%
SPLG0.34%
VTI0.33%
VT0.21%
ONEO0.07%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

MLM vs LIN: Head-to-Head Analysis

Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. (MLM) and Linde plc (LIN) represent two companies in the Basic Materials sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, MLM leads 5–4 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, MLM generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 6.5% compared to LIN's 10.3%. This suggests LIN is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

The 252-day rolling correlation between MLM and LIN is 0.366, indicating moderate co-movement, with some diversification value from holding both in a portfolio context.

MLM appears in 28 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while LIN appears in 20 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, MLM or LIN?

Our quantitative analysis compares MLM and LIN across nine fundamental dimensions. MLM wins the Tale of the Tape 5–4. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are MLM and LIN correlated?

The 252-day correlation between MLM and LIN is 0.366. They show moderate correlation — partially diversifying.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.