Stock vs Stock Comparison

Constellation Brands, Inc. vs Costco Wholesale Corporation

COST wins the Tale of the Tape 8–1.

STZ$135.40
COST$961.83

🏆 Tale of the Tape

18
STZCOST
Profitability (Net Margin)2.9%
14.4xValuation (P/E)49.8x
Efficiency (ROIC)21.7%
Health (Piotroski F)6/9
Safety (Altman Z)10.0
Growth (Rev YoY)8.2%
-0.31Risk (Sharpe 1Y)-0.05
Balance Sheet (D/E)1.64x
FCF Yield1.80%

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Rolling Correlation

0.098
252-Day Correlation
0.069
126-Day Correlation

Low correlation — excellent diversification pair.

Fundamentals

MetricSTZCOST
Market Cap$23.9B$424.1B
P/E Ratio14.4x49.8x
Forward P/E11.1x42.3x
P/B2.97x25.65x
Dividend Yield2.97%0.61%
Beta0.420.91

Quantitative Metrics

MetricSTZCOST
DCF Fair Value$576.10
DCF Upside-41.3%
Piotroski F6/9
Altman Z10.02
Beneish M-2.66
FCF Yield1.80%
Net Debt/EBITDA-0.6x
ROIC21.7%
WACC10.8%
ROIC – WACC10.9pp
Gross Margin12.8%
Net Margin2.9%
Rev Growth YoY8.2%
Sharpe (1Y)-0.31-0.05
Max Drawdown 3Y
FCF Payout Ratio28%

STZ Price

Loading chart...

COST Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

STZ found in:

MOAT2.35%
XLP1.38%
VDC0.87%
VOE0.39%
VO0.22%
RSP0.21%
ONEY0.18%
ONEV0.17%
VIG0.10%
VYM0.09%
SCHG0.08%
VTV0.08%
SPYV0.07%
VFVA0.07%
VONV0.07%
IWD0.07%
VOO0.04%
SCHX0.04%
SPY0.03%
SCHB0.03%
IVV0.03%
SPLG0.03%
VTI0.03%
VONE0.03%
ITOT0.03%
URTH0.03%
SPTM0.03%
ONEO0.03%
ACWI0.03%
QUS0.02%

COST found in:

VDC12.27%
XLP9.78%
IYC4.26%
MGV2.23%
QQQ2.10%
VIG2.03%
SCHG1.70%
VFQY1.64%
SPYV1.62%
IWF1.60%
IVE1.58%
XRT1.51%
VONG1.45%
VFMV1.40%
VUG1.32%
QUS1.27%
ESGV0.89%
DGRW0.82%
VOO0.73%
SPY0.73%
SCHX0.72%
SPLG0.69%
VONE0.68%
SPTM0.67%
SCHB0.67%
IVV0.65%
VTI0.65%
ITOT0.58%
URTH0.52%
ACWI0.43%
VT0.40%
SDY0.23%
RSP0.21%
GWX0.11%
ONEO0.04%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

STZ vs COST: Head-to-Head Analysis

Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) represent two companies in the Consumer Defensive sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, COST leads 8–1 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

The 252-day rolling correlation between STZ and COST is 0.098, indicating low correlation, making them an effective diversification pair in a portfolio context.

STZ appears in 30 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while COST appears in 35 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, STZ or COST?

Our quantitative analysis compares STZ and COST across nine fundamental dimensions. COST wins the Tale of the Tape 8–1. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are STZ and COST correlated?

The 252-day correlation between STZ and COST is 0.098. They have low correlation, offering good diversification.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.