Stock vs Stock Comparison

CF Industries Holdings, Inc. vs Linde plc

CF wins the Tale of the Tape 8–1.

CF$113.48
LIN$495.91

🏆 Tale of the Tape

81
CFLIN
20.5%Profitability (Net Margin)20.3%
10.1xValuation (P/E)33.0x
14.3%Efficiency (ROIC)10.3%
8/9Health (Piotroski F)5/9
3.4Safety (Altman Z)4.0
19.3%Growth (Rev YoY)3.0%
1.59Risk (Sharpe 1Y)0.66
0.81xBalance Sheet (D/E)1.18x
9.06%FCF Yield2.05%

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Rolling Correlation

0.150
252-Day Correlation
0.198
126-Day Correlation

Low correlation — excellent diversification pair.

Fundamentals

MetricCFLIN
Market Cap$17.3B$230.1B
P/E Ratio10.1x33.0x
Forward P/E10.1x25.3x
P/B3.23x5.97x
Dividend Yield1.78%1.29%
Beta0.420.74

Quantitative Metrics

MetricCFLIN
DCF Fair Value$237.23$96.04
DCF Upside+95.0%-81.1%
Piotroski F8/95/9
Altman Z3.403.96
Beneish M-2.79-2.62
FCF Yield9.06%2.05%
Net Debt/EBITDA0.4x1.2x
ROIC14.3%10.3%
WACC7.5%9.3%
ROIC – WACC6.8pp1.1pp
Gross Margin38.5%48.8%
Net Margin20.5%20.3%
Rev Growth YoY19.3%3.0%
Sharpe (1Y)1.590.66
Max Drawdown 3Y
FCF Payout Ratio18%55%

CF Price

Loading chart...

LIN Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

CF found in:

XLB2.38%
VAW1.24%
ONEY0.63%
SCHD0.56%
VBR0.43%
ONEV0.38%
ONEO0.35%
VB0.24%
RSP0.24%
VFQY0.23%
VFVA0.22%
DGRW0.11%
VYM0.08%
IWD0.07%
SPYV0.07%
GWX0.07%
VONV0.06%
SCHV0.05%
ESGV0.04%
QUS0.04%
VONE0.03%
VOO0.03%
VTI0.03%
SPY0.03%
SPTM0.03%
SCHX0.02%
SCHB0.02%
SPLG0.02%
URTH0.02%
IVV0.02%
ITOT0.02%
ACWI0.02%
EWX0.02%

LIN found in:

IYM19.89%
VAW14.98%
XLB14.97%
MGV1.15%
VIG1.05%
VYM0.98%
VTV0.90%
SPYV0.83%
QUS0.76%
VONV0.72%
SDY0.57%
ESGV0.47%
VOO0.38%
SPY0.38%
VONE0.36%
SPTM0.35%
SPLG0.34%
VTI0.33%
VT0.21%
ONEO0.07%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

CF vs LIN: Head-to-Head Analysis

CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF) and Linde plc (LIN) represent two companies in the Basic Materials sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, CF leads 8–1 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, CF generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 14.3% compared to LIN's 10.3%. This suggests CF is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

The 252-day rolling correlation between CF and LIN is 0.150, indicating low correlation, making them an effective diversification pair in a portfolio context.

CF appears in 33 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while LIN appears in 20 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, CF or LIN?

Our quantitative analysis compares CF and LIN across nine fundamental dimensions. CF wins the Tale of the Tape 8–1. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are CF and LIN correlated?

The 252-day correlation between CF and LIN is 0.150. They have low correlation, offering good diversification.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.