Stock vs Stock Comparison

Colgate-Palmolive Company vs Walmart Inc.

WMT wins the Tale of the Tape 5–4.

CL$84.87
WMT$116.89

🏆 Tale of the Tape

45
CLWMT
10.5%Profitability (Net Margin)3.1%
34.9xValuation (P/E)40.8x
27.7%Efficiency (ROIC)14.4%
5/9Health (Piotroski F)7/9
6.7Safety (Altman Z)6.7
1.4%Growth (Rev YoY)4.7%
-0.36Risk (Sharpe 1Y)1.40
43.74xBalance Sheet (D/E)1.68x
4.96%FCF Yield1.44%

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Rolling Correlation

0.332
252-Day Correlation
0.368
126-Day Correlation

Moderately correlated — some diversification benefit from holding both.

Fundamentals

MetricCLWMT
Market Cap$72.1B$922.6B
P/E Ratio34.9x40.8x
Forward P/E22.3x35.2x
P/B497.96x9.26x
Dividend Yield2.35%0.86%
Beta0.300.65

Quantitative Metrics

MetricCLWMT
DCF Fair Value$132.69$40.45
DCF Upside+58.0%-67.5%
Piotroski F5/97/9
Altman Z6.666.70
Beneish M-3.01-2.72
FCF Yield4.96%1.44%
Net Debt/EBITDA1.4x0.5x
ROIC27.7%14.4%
WACC7.6%8.8%
ROIC – WACC20.1pp5.6pp
Gross Margin60.1%24.9%
Net Margin10.5%3.1%
Rev Growth YoY1.4%4.7%
Sharpe (1Y)-0.361.40
Max Drawdown 3Y
FCF Payout Ratio50%50%

CL Price

Loading chart...

WMT Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

CL found in:

XLP4.48%
IYK3.05%
VDC2.16%
NOBL1.62%
SDY1.17%
HDV0.97%
ONEV0.38%
MGV0.34%
QUS0.33%
VIG0.31%
VYM0.29%
VTV0.27%
SCHV0.27%
SPYV0.25%
RSP0.23%
ONEO0.15%
ESGV0.14%
SCHX0.13%
SCHB0.12%
IWD0.12%
IWF0.12%
SPY0.11%
VONV0.11%
VOO0.11%
IVV0.11%
SPTM0.11%
SPLG0.10%
VONE0.10%
VTI0.10%
VONG0.10%
ITOT0.10%
URTH0.09%
ACWI0.07%
VT0.06%

WMT found in:

VDC16.16%
XLP11.15%
IYC4.59%
MGV2.87%
VIG2.60%
VTV2.25%
IVE2.03%
SCHV1.89%
SPYV1.84%
IWD1.60%
VONV1.58%
QUS1.52%
NOBL1.49%
DIA1.48%
XRT1.39%
LRGF1.25%
VFQY1.18%
DGRW0.97%
VOO0.94%
SCHX0.90%
VONE0.87%
SCHB0.84%
IVV0.83%
SPY0.83%
VTI0.83%
SPTM0.77%
SPLG0.76%
ITOT0.74%
URTH0.66%
ACWI0.54%
VT0.51%
VFMV0.47%
SDY0.32%
VFMO0.24%
RSP0.21%
IWF0.19%
VONG0.18%
ONEO0.01%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

CL vs WMT: Head-to-Head Analysis

Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) and Walmart Inc. (WMT) represent two companies in the Consumer Defensive sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, WMT leads 5–4 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, CL generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 27.7% compared to WMT's 14.4%. This suggests CL is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

The 252-day rolling correlation between CL and WMT is 0.332, indicating moderate co-movement, with some diversification value from holding both in a portfolio context.

CL appears in 34 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while WMT appears in 38 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, CL or WMT?

Our quantitative analysis compares CL and WMT across nine fundamental dimensions. WMT wins the Tale of the Tape 5–4. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are CL and WMT correlated?

The 252-day correlation between CL and WMT is 0.332. They show moderate correlation — partially diversifying.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.