Stock vs Stock Comparison

Diamondback Energy, Inc. vs Shell plc

SHEL wins the Tale of the Tape 5–3.

FANG$210.59
SHEL$86.77

🏆 Tale of the Tape

35
FANGSHEL
11.2%Profitability (Net Margin)6.7%
195.4xValuation (P/E)13.1x
2.5%Efficiency (ROIC)9.5%
5/9Health (Piotroski F)5/9
1.5Safety (Altman Z)2.5
35.4%Growth (Rev YoY)-6.1%
1.14Risk (Sharpe 1Y)1.82
0.65xBalance Sheet (D/E)1.11x
-1.06%FCF Yield8.72%

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Rolling Correlation

0.645
252-Day Correlation
0.574
126-Day Correlation

Moderately correlated — some diversification benefit from holding both.

Fundamentals

MetricFANGSHEL
Market Cap$53.9B$233.8B
P/E Ratio195.4x13.1x
Forward P/E11.0x9.2x
P/B1.48x1.38x
Dividend Yield2.30%3.71%
Beta0.44-0.24

Quantitative Metrics

MetricFANGSHEL
DCF Fair Value$64.95
DCF Upside-29.9%
Piotroski F5/95/9
Altman Z1.492.49
Beneish M-2.96
FCF Yield-1.06%8.72%
Net Debt/EBITDA1.9x0.2x
ROIC2.5%9.5%
WACC7.2%7.4%
ROIC – WACC-4.6pp2.0pp
Gross Margin35.0%15.9%
Net Margin11.2%6.7%
Rev Growth YoY35.4%-6.1%
Sharpe (1Y)1.141.82
Max Drawdown 3Y-18.5%
FCF Payout Ratio35%

FANG Price

Loading chart...

SHEL Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

FANG found in:

XOP2.91%
XLE2.14%
VDE1.51%
VOE0.72%
VO0.41%
VFVA0.33%
QQQ0.24%
RSP0.20%
VYM0.17%
VTV0.16%
SPYV0.14%
IWD0.13%
VONV0.12%
SCHV0.11%
QUS0.06%
SPY0.06%
VONE0.06%
VOO0.06%
VTI0.06%
SCHX0.05%
SPTM0.05%
SCHB0.05%
IVV0.05%
SPLG0.05%
ITOT0.04%
VT0.04%
DGRW0.04%
URTH0.04%
ACWI0.03%
ONEO0.01%

SHEL found in:

VGK1.51%
VYMI1.40%
VEA0.82%
CWI0.78%
SPDW0.76%
VEU0.65%
VXUS0.59%
VT0.23%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

FANG vs SHEL: Head-to-Head Analysis

Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) and Shell plc (SHEL) represent two companies in the Energy sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, SHEL leads 5–3 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, FANG generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 2.5% compared to SHEL's 9.5%. This suggests SHEL is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

The 252-day rolling correlation between FANG and SHEL is 0.645, indicating moderate co-movement, with some diversification value from holding both in a portfolio context.

FANG appears in 30 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while SHEL appears in 8 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, FANG or SHEL?

Our quantitative analysis compares FANG and SHEL across nine fundamental dimensions. SHEL wins the Tale of the Tape 5–3. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are FANG and SHEL correlated?

The 252-day correlation between FANG and SHEL is 0.645. They show moderate correlation — partially diversifying.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.