Stock vs Stock Comparison

Newmont Corporation vs Linde plc

NEM wins the Tale of the Tape 9–0.

NEM$109.50
LIN$495.91

🏆 Tale of the Tape

90
NEMLIN
31.3%Profitability (Net Margin)20.3%
14.2xValuation (P/E)33.0x
17.8%Efficiency (ROIC)10.3%
9/9Health (Piotroski F)5/9
4.7Safety (Altman Z)4.0
21.3%Growth (Rev YoY)3.0%
2.09Risk (Sharpe 1Y)0.66
0.68xBalance Sheet (D/E)1.18x
5.66%FCF Yield2.05%

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Rolling Correlation

0.090
252-Day Correlation
0.071
126-Day Correlation

Low correlation — excellent diversification pair.

Fundamentals

MetricNEMLIN
Market Cap$117.2B$230.1B
P/E Ratio14.2x33.0x
Forward P/E9.6x25.3x
P/B3.37x5.97x
Dividend Yield0.95%1.29%
Beta0.450.74

Quantitative Metrics

MetricNEMLIN
DCF Fair Value$351.21$96.04
DCF Upside+201.5%-81.1%
Piotroski F9/95/9
Altman Z4.723.96
Beneish M-2.67-2.62
FCF Yield5.66%2.05%
Net Debt/EBITDA-0.2x1.2x
ROIC17.8%10.3%
WACC7.8%9.3%
ROIC – WACC9.9pp1.1pp
Gross Margin53.2%48.8%
Net Margin31.3%20.3%
Rev Growth YoY21.3%3.0%
Sharpe (1Y)2.090.66
Max Drawdown 3Y
FCF Payout Ratio15%55%

NEM Price

Loading chart...

LIN Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

NEM found in:

IYM10.51%
GDX8.79%
VAW7.76%
XLB7.36%
XME3.98%
DVY1.60%
ONEY1.22%
VOE1.07%
VFMO0.97%
DGRW0.80%
VFQY0.79%
VO0.61%
VYM0.51%
SCHV0.48%
VTV0.47%
QUS0.43%
IWD0.39%
VONV0.37%
ONEO0.36%
SPYG0.34%
MGV0.30%
VFVA0.28%
ESGV0.24%
RSP0.23%
SCHX0.23%
SCHB0.21%
VOO0.20%
VONE0.19%
IVV0.19%
SPY0.19%
SPTM0.17%
VTI0.17%
URTH0.17%
ITOT0.17%
SPLG0.15%
ACWI0.13%
VT0.10%
VIGI0.08%
VGK0.03%
SPDW0.01%

LIN found in:

IYM19.89%
VAW14.98%
XLB14.97%
MGV1.15%
VIG1.05%
VYM0.98%
VTV0.90%
SPYV0.83%
QUS0.76%
VONV0.72%
SDY0.57%
ESGV0.47%
VOO0.38%
SPY0.38%
VONE0.36%
SPTM0.35%
SPLG0.34%
VTI0.33%
VT0.21%
ONEO0.07%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

NEM vs LIN: Head-to-Head Analysis

Newmont Corporation (NEM) and Linde plc (LIN) represent two companies in the Basic Materials sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, NEM leads 9–0 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, NEM generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 17.8% compared to LIN's 10.3%. This suggests NEM is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

The 252-day rolling correlation between NEM and LIN is 0.090, indicating low correlation, making them an effective diversification pair in a portfolio context.

NEM appears in 40 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while LIN appears in 20 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, NEM or LIN?

Our quantitative analysis compares NEM and LIN across nine fundamental dimensions. NEM wins the Tale of the Tape 9–0. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are NEM and LIN correlated?

The 252-day correlation between NEM and LIN is 0.090. They have low correlation, offering good diversification.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.