Stock vs Stock Comparison

Core Natural Resources, Inc. vs Exxon Mobil Corporation

XOM wins the Tale of the Tape 7–2.

CNR$96.43
XOM$152.53

🏆 Tale of the Tape

27
CNRXOM
-3.7%Profitability (Net Margin)8.9%
Valuation (P/E)24.5x
-2.9%Efficiency (ROIC)8.8%
3/9Health (Piotroski F)5/9
2.0Safety (Altman Z)4.6
92.4%Growth (Rev YoY)-4.5%
0.65Risk (Sharpe 1Y)1.59
0.67xBalance Sheet (D/E)0.68x
0.47%FCF Yield3.63%

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Rolling Correlation

0.231
252-Day Correlation
0.277
126-Day Correlation

Low correlation — excellent diversification pair.

Fundamentals

MetricCNRXOM
Market Cap$4.5B$602.1B
P/E Ratio24.5x
Forward P/E13.0x13.6x
P/B1.22x2.34x
Dividend Yield0.45%2.84%
Beta0.140.18

Quantitative Metrics

MetricCNRXOM
DCF Fair Value$8.51$41.42
DCF Upside-90.5%-72.9%
Piotroski F3/95/9
Altman Z2.004.65
Beneish M-1.67-2.73
FCF Yield0.47%3.63%
Net Debt/EBITDA-0.3x0.3x
ROIC-2.9%8.8%
WACC7.7%7.8%
ROIC – WACC-10.6pp0.9pp
Gross Margin-0.0%22.0%
Net Margin-3.7%8.9%
Rev Growth YoY92.4%-4.5%
Sharpe (1Y)0.651.59
Max Drawdown 3Y-52.1%
FCF Payout Ratio124%73%

CNR Price

Loading chart...

XOM Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

CNR found in:

XME3.75%
VIGI1.10%
SLYV0.51%
SPSM0.26%
CWI0.23%
SPDW0.22%
VDE0.21%
VEA0.19%
VEU0.15%
VTWO0.14%
VXUS0.14%
VBK0.13%
VT0.06%
SPTM0.01%

XOM found in:

XLE22.55%
IYE21.72%
VDE21.06%
HDV10.26%
DGRW3.68%
MTUM3.43%
MGV3.19%
VIG2.90%
DGRO2.90%
VYM2.72%
XOP2.62%
VTV2.51%
IWD2.36%
IVE2.26%
SPYV2.25%
SCHV2.17%
VONV1.99%
USMV1.60%
NOBL1.58%
QUS1.45%
DVY1.36%
VFMV1.28%
SDY1.08%
VOO1.04%
SCHX1.03%
SPY1.02%
VONE0.99%
SCHB0.97%
SPTM0.94%
VTI0.93%
DFAC0.88%
IVV0.87%
SPLG0.84%
ITOT0.77%
URTH0.76%
ACWI0.63%
VT0.58%
VFMO0.52%
RSP0.23%
ONEO0.07%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

CNR vs XOM: Head-to-Head Analysis

Core Natural Resources, Inc. (CNR) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) represent two companies in the Energy sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, XOM leads 7–2 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, CNR generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of -2.9% compared to XOM's 8.8%. This suggests XOM is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

The 252-day rolling correlation between CNR and XOM is 0.231, indicating low correlation, making them an effective diversification pair in a portfolio context.

CNR appears in 14 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while XOM appears in 40 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, CNR or XOM?

Our quantitative analysis compares CNR and XOM across nine fundamental dimensions. XOM wins the Tale of the Tape 7–2. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are CNR and XOM correlated?

The 252-day correlation between CNR and XOM is 0.231. They have low correlation, offering good diversification.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.