Stock vs Stock Comparison

Waste Management, Inc. vs Arcosa, Inc.

WM wins the Tale of the Tape 6–2.

WM$218.00
ACA

🏆 Tale of the Tape

62
WMACA
10.7%Profitability (Net Margin)7.2%
30.6xValuation (P/E)28.3x
8.5%Efficiency (ROIC)6.2%
8/9Health (Piotroski F)8/9
2.9Safety (Altman Z)
14.2%Growth (Rev YoY)12.2%
0.04Risk (Sharpe 1Y)
3.59xBalance Sheet (D/E)0.89x
2.46%FCF Yield

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Fundamentals

MetricWMACA
Market Cap$84.9B$5.9B
P/E Ratio30.6x28.3x
Forward P/E22.9x22.4x
P/B8.49x2.23x
Dividend Yield1.67%0.17%
Beta0.490.96

Quantitative Metrics

MetricWMACA
DCF Fair Value$132.00$99.96
DCF Upside-42.9%
Piotroski F8/98/9
Altman Z2.92
Beneish M-2.76-2.48
FCF Yield2.46%
Net Debt/EBITDA3.1x2.3x
ROIC8.5%6.2%
WACC7.4%
ROIC – WACC1.1pp
Gross Margin40.4%22.4%
Net Margin10.7%7.2%
Rev Growth YoY14.2%12.2%
Sharpe (1Y)0.04
Max Drawdown 3Y
FCF Payout Ratio47%6%

WM Price

Loading chart...

ACA Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

WM found in:

IDU5.15%
XLI1.52%
USMV1.47%
VIS1.33%
SDY0.68%
MGV0.47%
QUS0.47%
VIG0.39%
VTV0.37%
VYM0.36%
VFMV0.35%
IWF0.31%
SCHV0.30%
SPYV0.28%
VONG0.28%
RSP0.21%
ESGV0.17%
SCHX0.14%
VOO0.14%
VTI0.14%
IVV0.14%
SCHB0.13%
VONE0.13%
SPY0.13%
SPLG0.12%
ITOT0.12%
SPTM0.12%
URTH0.11%
ACWI0.09%
VT0.08%
ONEO0.07%

ACA found in:

SLYG0.45%
SPSM0.35%
SLYV0.25%
VTWO0.18%
VFMO0.15%
VBR0.14%
VGK0.12%
VYMI0.10%
VIS0.09%
SPDW0.08%
VB0.08%
VXF0.08%
VEA0.06%
VSGX0.06%
CWI0.05%
VEU0.05%
VXUS0.04%
SPTM0.01%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

WM vs ACA: Head-to-Head Analysis

Waste Management, Inc. (WM) and Arcosa, Inc. (ACA) represent two companies in the Industrials sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, WM leads 6–2 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, WM generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 8.5% compared to ACA's 6.2%. This suggests WM is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

WM appears in 31 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while ACA appears in 18 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, WM or ACA?

Our quantitative analysis compares WM and ACA across nine fundamental dimensions. WM wins the Tale of the Tape 6–2. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are WM and ACA correlated?

Correlation data is not yet available for this pair. Check back after both stocks have sufficient trading history.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.