Stock vs Stock Comparison

Brinker International, Inc. vs Amazon.com, Inc.

EAT wins the Tale of the Tape 5–4.

EAT
AMZN$250.02

🏆 Tale of the Tape

54
EATAMZN
7.1%Profitability (Net Margin)10.8%
13.7xValuation (P/E)31.7x
20.2%Efficiency (ROIC)13.1%
8/9Health (Piotroski F)6/9
4.1Safety (Altman Z)5.5
21.9%Growth (Rev YoY)12.4%
Risk (Sharpe 1Y)0.72
6.22xBalance Sheet (D/E)0.99x
6.51%FCF Yield0.30%

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Fundamentals

MetricEATAMZN
Market Cap$6.0B$2.91T
P/E Ratio13.7x31.7x
Forward P/E11.0x27.4x
P/B15.55x6.59x
Dividend Yield
Beta1.361.47

Quantitative Metrics

MetricEATAMZN
DCF Fair Value$165.06$6.91
DCF Upside-97.1%
Piotroski F8/96/9
Altman Z4.105.50
Beneish M-2.92-2.59
FCF Yield6.51%0.30%
Net Debt/EBITDA0.5x-0.1x
ROIC20.2%13.1%
WACC12.7%13.1%
ROIC – WACC7.6pp0.1pp
Gross Margin18.3%50.3%
Net Margin7.1%10.8%
Rev Growth YoY21.9%12.4%
Sharpe (1Y)0.72
Max Drawdown 3Y-30.9%
FCF Payout Ratio

EAT Price

Loading chart...

AMZN Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

EAT found in:

SLYG0.72%
SPSM0.35%
VTWO0.20%
VBK0.20%
VCR0.15%
VXF0.08%
VB0.08%
SPTM0.01%

AMZN found in:

XLY27.86%
VCR24.35%
IYC14.94%
FDN11.58%
OEF5.75%
VONG5.30%
SCHG5.14%
MGK5.12%
VUG5.11%
QQQ4.92%
JEPQ4.72%
IWF4.66%
SPYV4.28%
IVE4.26%
VOO4.19%
IVW4.12%
SPY4.10%
ESGV4.02%
ARKW4.02%
SPYG3.97%
VONE3.87%
IWB3.86%
IVV3.84%
SPTM3.80%
SPLG3.80%
VTI3.69%
LRGF3.51%
ITOT3.39%
ARKX3.38%
DIA3.28%
SCHX3.28%
ARKQ3.23%
SCHB3.07%
DFAC3.06%
XNTK2.74%
ARKK2.68%
ACWI2.39%
URTH2.36%
ARKF2.31%
VT2.26%
VONV2.13%
IWD1.81%
XRT1.79%
JEPI1.76%
MOAT1.19%
QUS0.85%
RSP0.20%
VFMV0.04%
ONEO0.02%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

EAT vs AMZN: Head-to-Head Analysis

Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) and Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) represent two companies in the Consumer Cyclical sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, EAT leads 5–4 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, EAT generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 20.2% compared to AMZN's 13.1%. This suggests EAT is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

EAT appears in 8 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while AMZN appears in 49 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, EAT or AMZN?

Our quantitative analysis compares EAT and AMZN across nine fundamental dimensions. EAT wins the Tale of the Tape 5–4. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are EAT and AMZN correlated?

Correlation data is not yet available for this pair. Check back after both stocks have sufficient trading history.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.